On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:09:45AM -0400, Paolo Autore wrote:
> Juniper does J-flow
AFAIK J-Flow is just an attempt to call regular old fashioned NetFlow
something other than "cflow". I'm not aware of any actual new protocol or
functionality, and it seems like a fairly half-hearted effort consid
Juniper does J-flow
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard A
Steenbergen
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 01:32
To: Ivan c
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Cflow, IPFix which one
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:54
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:54:53AM +1000, Ivan c wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Which standard does Juniper do? Sflow, NetFlow, IPFix, CFlow etc..?
>
> And does anyone have a open source tools to interrogate the
> information out of the Juniper for traffic accounting?
CFlow isn't actually a standard, it's
Ivan,
Juniper currently supports the CFLOWD record format, although I have pushed
them for IPFIX support and I believe it is on the JUNOS roadmap. As far as
tools to interrogate the data, there are many software packages which you
may purchase such as Arbor Networks Peakflow SP, etc., but if you
Hi All,
Which standard does Juniper do? Sflow, NetFlow, IPFix, CFlow etc..?
And does anyone have a open source tools to interrogate the
information out of the Juniper for traffic accounting?
Thanks
Ivan
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.net
5 matches
Mail list logo