Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Cflow, IPFix which one

2007-08-08 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:09:45AM -0400, Paolo Autore wrote: > Juniper does J-flow AFAIK J-Flow is just an attempt to call regular old fashioned NetFlow something other than "cflow". I'm not aware of any actual new protocol or functionality, and it seems like a fairly half-hearted effort consid

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Cflow, IPFix which one

2007-08-08 Thread Paolo Autore
Juniper does J-flow -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard A Steenbergen Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 01:32 To: Ivan c Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Cflow, IPFix which one On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:54

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Cflow, IPFix which one

2007-08-07 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:54:53AM +1000, Ivan c wrote: > Hi All, > > Which standard does Juniper do? Sflow, NetFlow, IPFix, CFlow etc..? > > And does anyone have a open source tools to interrogate the > information out of the Juniper for traffic accounting? CFlow isn't actually a standard, it's

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Cflow, IPFix which one

2007-08-07 Thread Stefan Fouant
Ivan, Juniper currently supports the CFLOWD record format, although I have pushed them for IPFIX support and I believe it is on the JUNOS roadmap. As far as tools to interrogate the data, there are many software packages which you may purchase such as Arbor Networks Peakflow SP, etc., but if you

[j-nsp] Juniper Cflow, IPFix which one

2007-08-07 Thread Ivan c
Hi All, Which standard does Juniper do? Sflow, NetFlow, IPFix, CFlow etc..? And does anyone have a open source tools to interrogate the information out of the Juniper for traffic accounting? Thanks Ivan ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.net