Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-08-03 Thread William Johansson
Hi Yes I have it running on Centos, using virsh for vm management. Let me know if you need any pointers. // William > 1 aug 2015 kl. 18:13 skrev Chris Woodfield : > > Has anyone gotten VMX running on a non-Ubuntu KVM machine (ex. RHEL/CentOS)? > > -C > >> On Jul 30, 2015, at 6:11 AM, Chris

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-08-01 Thread Chris Woodfield
Has anyone gotten VMX running on a non-Ubuntu KVM machine (ex. RHEL/CentOS)? -C > On Jul 30, 2015, at 6:11 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Phil Bedard said: >> I’m sure they’ve had it running in VMWare, but it’s a little more difficult >> and you need the Enterprise Plus version

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-31 Thread Ben Dale
> On 30 Jul 2015, at 11:11 pm, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Phil Bedard said: >> I’m sure they’ve had it running in VMWare, but it’s a little more difficult >> and you need the Enterprise Plus version of vSphere to get virtual serial >> ports. I’d be more comfortable running it un

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-30 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Phil Bedard said: > I’m sure they’ve had it running in VMWare, but it’s a little more difficult > and you need the Enterprise Plus version of vSphere to get virtual serial > ports. I’d be more comfortable running it under KVM myself. Just an FYI: if you are looking for a KV

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-30 Thread Mark Tinka
On 30/Jul/15 11:39, David Blundell wrote: > Hi Robert, > > We've got a few use cases for the vMX products: > > 1/ Virtual RR > 2/ Test driven development with vmx, opencontrail and jenkins > 3/ Edge routing for small compute clusters that need < 500Mbps internet > bandwidth > 4/ Lab testing of d

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-30 Thread Phil Bedard
: David Blundell Cc: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net" Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations >I was hoping to use them for edge routing (full IPv4 tables) at POPs with >total bandwidth <1gbps. But, I would feel much more comfortable with >VMWare. I hope support for VMWare

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-30 Thread Josh Baird
ing for small compute clusters that need < 500Mbps internet > bandwidth > 4/ Lab testing of designs > > > -Original Message- > > From: Robert J Huey [mailto:rh...@anzus.com] > > Sent: 30 July 2015 05:08 > > To: David Blundell > > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-30 Thread David Blundell
Robert J Huey [mailto:rh...@anzus.com] > Sent: 30 July 2015 05:08 > To: David Blundell > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations > > So what's the use case... Run this as the local RR? Or manage routes > between tenants in com

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-30 Thread Santiago Martinez
Hi, i've seen both KVM and VMWARE version running last week. Kvm version was sometimes crashing during boot process while the vmware was really stable. Regards Santiago Sent from my iPhone > On 29 Jul 2015, at 21:52, Raphael Mazelier wrote: > > > > Le 29/07/15 22:13, Josh Baird a écrit : >

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-29 Thread Robert J Huey
So what's the use case... Run this as the local RR? Or manage routes between tenants in compute? Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 29, 2015, at 9:44 AM, David Blundell > wrote: > > Has anyone testing the vMX software found out its RIB/FIB/L3VPN limitations? > > The Juniper datasheet at > ht

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-29 Thread Raphael Mazelier
Le 29/07/15 22:13, Josh Baird a écrit : I was first told that vMX would ship with it's own Hypervisor. Then I heard it would ship as ESXi images. Ok, that's fine. But, alas, I have to install Ubuntu and run it as KVM guests? This is not what I was expecting. I wonder if VMware is on ge r

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-29 Thread Josh Baird
I was first told that vMX would ship with it's own Hypervisor. Then I heard it would ship as ESXi images. Ok, that's fine. But, alas, I have to install Ubuntu and run it as KVM guests? This is not what I was expecting. I wonder if VMware is on ge roadmap? Does anyone know? > On Jul 29, 201

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-29 Thread Raphael Mazelier
Le 29/07/15 19:15, Josh Baird a écrit : I hope the 128k RIB/FIB limitation is not correct. But who knows.. vMX is essentially vaporware to me at this point. Nope this isn't vaporware. I've got plenty of old version and the general beta was released. On unofficial version there is no limita

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-29 Thread Josh Baird
I hope the 128k RIB/FIB limitation is not correct. But who knows.. vMX is essentially vaporware to me at this point. On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:44 PM, David Blundell < david.blund...@100percentit.com> wrote: > Has anyone testing the vMX software found out its RIB/FIB/L3VPN > limitations? > > The

[j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

2015-07-29 Thread David Blundell
Has anyone testing the vMX software found out its RIB/FIB/L3VPN limitations? The Juniper datasheet at http://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000522-en.pdf says the parts VMX-100M to VMX-500M "Includes all features in full scale" which I take to mean they can handle as many ro