Hi
Yes I have it running on Centos, using virsh for vm management.
Let me know if you need any pointers.
//
William
1 aug 2015 kl. 18:13 skrev Chris Woodfield rek...@semihuman.com:
Has anyone gotten VMX running on a non-Ubuntu KVM machine (ex. RHEL/CentOS)?
-C
On Jul 30, 2015, at
Has anyone gotten VMX running on a non-Ubuntu KVM machine (ex. RHEL/CentOS)?
-C
On Jul 30, 2015, at 6:11 AM, Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Phil Bedard phil...@gmail.com said:
I’m sure they’ve had it running in VMWare, but it’s a little more difficult
and you need
On 30 Jul 2015, at 11:11 pm, Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Phil Bedard phil...@gmail.com said:
I’m sure they’ve had it running in VMWare, but it’s a little more difficult
and you need the Enterprise Plus version of vSphere to get virtual serial
ports. I’d be more
On 30/Jul/15 11:39, David Blundell wrote:
Hi Robert,
We've got a few use cases for the vMX products:
1/ Virtual RR
2/ Test driven development with vmx, opencontrail and jenkins
3/ Edge routing for small compute clusters that need 500Mbps internet
bandwidth
4/ Lab testing of designs
Once upon a time, Phil Bedard phil...@gmail.com said:
I’m sure they’ve had it running in VMWare, but it’s a little more difficult
and you need the Enterprise Plus version of vSphere to get virtual serial
ports. I’d be more comfortable running it under KVM myself.
Just an FYI: if you are
internet
bandwidth
4/ Lab testing of designs
-Original Message-
From: Robert J Huey [mailto:rh...@anzus.com]
Sent: 30 July 2015 05:08
To: David Blundell david.blund...@100percentit.com
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations
So what's
Hi, i've seen both KVM and VMWARE version running last week. Kvm version was
sometimes crashing during boot process while the vmware was really stable.
Regards
Santiago
Sent from my iPhone
On 29 Jul 2015, at 21:52, Raphael Mazelier r...@futomaki.net wrote:
Le 29/07/15 22:13, Josh
[mailto:rh...@anzus.com]
Sent: 30 July 2015 05:08
To: David Blundell david.blund...@100percentit.com
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations
So what's the use case... Run this as the local RR? Or manage routes
between tenants in compute?
On Jul 29
I hope the 128k RIB/FIB limitation is not correct. But who knows.. vMX is
essentially vaporware to me at this point.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:44 PM, David Blundell
david.blund...@100percentit.com wrote:
Has anyone testing the vMX software found out its RIB/FIB/L3VPN
limitations?
The
Has anyone testing the vMX software found out its RIB/FIB/L3VPN limitations?
The Juniper datasheet at
http://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000522-en.pdf says
the parts VMX-100M to VMX-500M Includes all features in full scale which I
take to mean they can handle as many
I was first told that vMX would ship with it's own Hypervisor. Then I heard it
would ship as ESXi images. Ok, that's fine.
But, alas, I have to install Ubuntu and run it as KVM guests? This is not what
I was expecting. I wonder if VMware is on ge roadmap? Does anyone know?
On Jul 29,
So what's the use case... Run this as the local RR? Or manage routes between
tenants in compute?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 29, 2015, at 9:44 AM, David Blundell david.blund...@100percentit.com
wrote:
Has anyone testing the vMX software found out its RIB/FIB/L3VPN limitations?
The
12 matches
Mail list logo
