tc.. neither of which
are options in the core.
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 4:11 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Junos Pulse / SRX240
r.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Hileman
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 4:01 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Junos Pulse / SRX240 problems
We've had nothing but bad luck with the pulse client on our srx240h ha
cluster. Right now it&
August 03, 2011 3:41 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Junos Pulse / SRX240 problems
I have a very simple VPN configuration for a non-uptime-critical
service, with an SRX240H and Dynamic VPN client licenses. This worked
fine with Junos 10.4R4.5 (JTAC recommended release) and the
7;s to srx210h's are buggy and broken as well...
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Wheeler
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 3:41 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Junos Pulse / SRX240 prob
I have a very simple VPN configuration for a non-uptime-critical
service, with an SRX240H and Dynamic VPN client licenses. This worked
fine with Junos 10.4R4.5 (JTAC recommended release) and the Juniper
Access Manager client. However, Dynamic VPN sessions were becoming
"stuck," and hours or days
5 matches
Mail list logo
