10.04.2012 20:13, Michael Still wrote:
> OP wanted to use the IRB ints as next hop for their respective
> networks. This is apparently not supported on the SRX platform in
> transparent mode:
Yeah, I mentioned this as well. In my post I just wanted to explain why
these (MX-style L2) commands were
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Pavel Lunin wrote:
> 4/10/2012 Doug Hanks wrote:
>
>>
>> I suggest that the OP use "set vlan " instead of "set bridge-domain
>> " Also use "set interfaces vlan" instead of "set interfaces irb"
>>
>> I'm not even sure why the SRX accepted this configuration.
>>
>>
4/10/2012 Doug Hanks wrote:
>
> I suggest that the OP use "set vlan " instead of "set bridge-domain
> " Also use "set interfaces vlan" instead of "set interfaces irb"
>
> I'm not even sure why the SRX accepted this configuration.
>
>
The MX-style L2 commands are supported on SRX (branch as well a
In the context of packet-mode, the family mpls is analogous to inet. This
is correct.
I suggest that the OP use "set vlan " instead of "set bridge-domain
" Also use "set interfaces vlan" instead of "set interfaces irb"
I'm not even sure why the SRX accepted this configuration.
Thank you,
--
On 04/09/2012 10:10 AM, bruno wrote:
not need to zone . coz i set it to packet mode
Your config only shows packet-mode for "family mpls". IPv4 will still be
flow mode.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/
0h
> JUNOS Software Release [11.4R1.6]
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original --
> From: "Tom Storey";
> Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 07:56 PM
> To: "bruno";
&
uot;;
Cc: "juniper-nsp";
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 feature on srx
What software are you running on your SRX's?
The only reason I ask is that I am running 10.4R4.5 on an SRX100, and
this is how I do my VLANs (SRX is in flow mode, but does that really
matter t
What software are you running on your SRX's?
The only reason I ask is that I am running 10.4R4.5 on an SRX100, and
this is how I do my VLANs (SRX is in flow mode, but does that really
matter to L2??):
interfaces {
fe-0/0/1 {
description "** Trunk to esxi1";
unit 0 {
not need to zone . coz i set it to packet mode
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
-- Original --
From: "ashish verma";
Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 05:09 PM
To: "bruno";
Cc: "juniper-nsp";
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Lay
Are you missing zones/policies since it is SRX?
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, bruno wrote:
> hello expert,
> i use two srx210h to test some Layer 2 networking features on MX Series
> routers. the topo is very simple
> PC1---SRX1SRX2PC2. the link in srx1---srx2 is set to trunk mode.
>
hello expert,
i use two srx210h to test some Layer 2 networking features on MX Series
routers. the topo is very simple
PC1---SRX1SRX2PC2. the link in srx1---srx2 is set to trunk mode. PC1
and PC2 is belong to vlan 100. PC1 can't ping PC2.
interfaces {
ge-0/0/1 {
descript
11 matches
Mail list logo