10.04.2012 20:13, Michael Still wrote:
OP wanted to use the IRB ints as next hop for their respective
networks. This is apparently not supported on the SRX platform in
transparent mode:
Yeah, I mentioned this as well. In my post I just wanted to explain why
these (MX-style L2) commands were
4/10/2012 Doug Hanks wrote:
I suggest that the OP use set vlan name instead of set bridge-domain
name Also use set interfaces vlan instead of set interfaces irb
I'm not even sure why the SRX accepted this configuration.
The MX-style L2 commands are supported on SRX (branch as well and
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Pavel Lunin plu...@senetsy.ru wrote:
4/10/2012 Doug Hanks wrote:
I suggest that the OP use set vlan name instead of set bridge-domain
name Also use set interfaces vlan instead of set interfaces irb
I'm not even sure why the SRX accepted this configuration.
hello expert,
i use two srx210h to test some Layer 2 networking features on MX Series
routers. the topo is very simple
PC1---SRX1SRX2PC2. the link in srx1---srx2 is set to trunk mode. PC1
and PC2 is belong to vlan 100. PC1 can't ping PC2.
interfaces {
ge-0/0/1 {
Are you missing zones/policies since it is SRX?
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, bruno bruno.juni...@gmail.com wrote:
hello expert,
i use two srx210h to test some Layer 2 networking features on MX Series
routers. the topo is very simple
PC1---SRX1SRX2PC2. the link in srx1---srx2 is
@puck.nether.net;
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 feature on srx
Are you missing zones/policies since it is SRX?
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, bruno bruno.juni...@gmail.com wrote:
hello expert,
i use two srx210h to test some Layer 2 networking features on MX Series
routers. the topo is very simple
PC1
What software are you running on your SRX's?
The only reason I ask is that I am running 10.4R4.5 on an SRX100, and
this is how I do my VLANs (SRX is in flow mode, but does that really
matter to L2??):
interfaces {
fe-0/0/1 {
description ** Trunk to esxi1;
unit 0 {
To: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com;
Cc: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net;
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 feature on srx
What software are you running on your SRX's?
The only reason I ask is that I am running 10.4R4.5 on an SRX100, and
this is how I do my VLANs (SRX is in flow mode, but does that really
[11.4R1.6]
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
-- Original --
From: Tom Storeyt...@snnap.net;
Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 07:56 PM
To: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com;
Cc: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net;
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 feature
On 04/09/2012 10:10 AM, bruno wrote:
not need to zone . coz i set it to packet mode
Your config only shows packet-mode for family mpls. IPv4 will still be
flow mode.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
In the context of packet-mode, the family mpls is analogous to inet. This
is correct.
I suggest that the OP use set vlan name instead of set bridge-domain
name Also use set interfaces vlan instead of set interfaces irb
I'm not even sure why the SRX accepted this configuration.
Thank you,
--
11 matches
Mail list logo