Richard A Steenbergen pisze
> http://www.memorydealers.com/12cisapcat60.html
>
>
"128MB Approved Cisco MSFC2 SDRAM SODIMM memory"
You can by a module... or make use of parts form C6500 :-)
Thanks for the hint!
Tomek
--
Tomasz Szewczyk
Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
e-mail: [EMA
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:34:24AM -0500, Hyunseog Ryu wrote:
> I think you may consider to upgrade the memory.
> If you use some feature set such as rpf-check, it will build another set
> of table to consume the memory.
> So if you use rpf-check, you can disable it to decrease heap memory
> uti
Szewczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/19/2008 03:21 AM
To
Kevin Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Fax to
Subject
Re: [j-nsp] M10 FEB heap usage (RPF/route options)
Hi,
We have quite similar problem. The FEB shows:
FEB status:
Hi,
We have quite similar problem. The FEB shows:
FEB status:
Temperature27 degrees C / 80 degrees F
CPU utilization11 percent
Interrupt utilization 19 percent
Heap utilization 96 percent
Buffer utilization
On Dec 14, 2007, at 5:02 PM, Nicolaj Kamensek wrote:
>> Heap utilization 97 percent
>
> what does
>
> show arp no-resolve | count
>
> say?
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> show arp no-resolve |count
Count: 411 lines
>> Is this normal? I seem to remember being able to fit 500k+ routes
>
Kevin Day schrieb:
Hi Kevin,
>Heap utilization 97 percent
what does
show arp no-resolve | count
say?
> It made sense that whatever "route options" are was the difference. I
> found an old post here discussing SSB SDRAM usage
> (http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper
I know this is going into undocumented unsupported territory and I'm
intentionally glossing over details that I know aren't as simple as
I'm making them here... But, we've got an M10 that's completely run
out of heap on the FEB after upgrading to 8.4 from 7.4.
(I dropped a few thousand v4 r
7 matches
Mail list logo
