We have several old m20's with RE2's terminating STM16 wavelengths,
all stable running JUNOS 9.3R2.8. This requires some hardware hacks -
if you want to get your hands dirty you can upgrade the 96MB CF card
on the RE2 to 1GB and the DRAM on SSB from 64MB to 128MB. I believe
the procedures are well
I have an M20 that has been working fine for a few years with no real
issues running 7.6 R4.3. I have been putting off upgrading this guy
long enough and was wondering what you guys thought would be the best
version of JunOS to goto now would be. I was thinking something in
the 8.5 train, but I
-nsp] M20 JunOS Recommendation
I have an M20 that has been working fine for a few years with no real
issues running 7.6 R4.3. I have been putting off upgrading this guy
long enough and was wondering what you guys thought would be the best
version of JunOS to goto now would be. I was thinking
My company is also using 8.5S4 for our M20s.
Jonathan
From: ava...@hq.speakeasy.net
To: jmadr...@gmail.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:12:26 -0700
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] M20 JunOS Recommendation
We currently have all of our M20's on 8.5S4 and have had no issues
@puck.nether.net
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:12:26 -0700
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] M20 JunOS Recommendation
We currently have all of our M20's on 8.5S4 and have had no issues
whatsoever, we upgraded from 7.5-daily. 8.5S4 is an extended release and if
you're not chasing features, I'd look
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:12:26AM -0700, Andy Vance wrote:
We currently have all of our M20's on 8.5S4 and have had no issues
whatsoever, we upgraded from 7.5-daily. 8.5S4 is an extended release
and if you're not chasing features, I'd look into utilizing it.
If you're using the original
6 matches
Mail list logo
