Re: [j-nsp] M320 SW upgrade from Junos 8.4 to 9.2

2009-01-06 Thread Robert Kern
Hi all, thanks for sharing your experiences. I also got advice from J-TAC to go with step-by-step migration, so my way will be 8.4--8.5--9.2 Regards, Robert On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:36 PM, David Ball davidtb...@gmail.com wrote: We went from 8.5-9.1R1.8, then to 9.2R2.15, both with little

Re: [j-nsp] M320 SW upgrade from Junos 8.4 to 9.2

2009-01-04 Thread Hangu Jeong
Hi, Refer to following instructions to upgrade to 9.2, In JUNOS Release 8.5, the JUNOS software was extended to use FreeBSD version 6.1. As a result, the following requirements apply when you upgrade your routing platform to JUNOS Release 8.5 and later: For J-series, M-series, MX-series, and

Re: [j-nsp] M320 SW upgrade from Junos 8.4 to 9.2

2009-01-04 Thread Robert Kern
Hi, We know that there is a big change from 8.4-8.5, that is why we decided to wait a for a while. Now we are planning to go with 9.2. We have enough free space to do an upgrade. The question is how should we do an upgrade or what are your experiences? Should we go directly to 9.2 ar we should do

Re: [j-nsp] M320 SW upgrade from Junos 8.4 to 9.2

2009-01-04 Thread David Ball
We went from 8.5-9.1R1.8, then to 9.2R2.15, both with little or no problems. I don't know of any specific reasons to not go 8.5-9.2, but Release Notes and upgrade instructions may provide insight. Otherwise, 8.5-9.1-9.2 worked for me. David 2009/1/4 Robert Kern cj1...@gmail.com: Hi, We

[j-nsp] M320 SW upgrade from Junos 8.4 to 9.2

2009-01-02 Thread robi robi
Hi all, plan is to upgrade our redundant-M320 boxes from Junos version 8.4 to 9.2. We have tried the usual upgrade procedure in a lab with direct migration to 9.2. We had quite a few problems like standby RE didn't come up at all (we had to downgrade both REs to 8.4). What are your experiences