Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability

2017-01-09 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 22 décembre 2016 15:15 +0100, Vincent Bernat  : > How reliable should MC-LAG be considered on EX and QFX series (in a pure > L2 setup)? > > I had a few bad experiences with virtual chassis where a hiccup usually > translates to both switches becoming unavailable. This is pretty rare of > course

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability

2016-12-23 Thread Aaron
r-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability Hey! I also think that the VC is quite reliable. However, by design, it is a bit fragile. rpd can die and take the whole VC down. I also remember quite a few problems with upgrades but this is quite ancient, so maybe this doesn't apply

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability

2016-12-23 Thread Aaron
ming Style (Kernighan & Plauger) ――― Original Message ――― From: Raphael Mazelier Sent: 22 décembre 2016 18:32 +0100 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Hey, > > My experience with VirtualChassis with a lot of them (you know where)

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability

2016-12-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
ssage ――― From: Raphael Mazelier Sent: 22 décembre 2016 18:32 +0100 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Hey, > > My experience with VirtualChassis with a lot of them (you know where) > is globally positive. In fact I dot not remember when a VC

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability

2016-12-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
should be quite independant of this MC-LAG stuff, right? -- Make sure comments and code agree. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger) ――― Original Message ――― From: Alberto Santos Sent: 22 décembre 2016 17:29 +0100 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG r

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability

2016-12-22 Thread Raphael Mazelier
Hey, My experience with VirtualChassis with a lot of them (you know where) is globally positive. In fact I dot not remember when a VC completly fail. This is not a perfect techno but it do the job for very low cost of setup. On EX series you have no choice, afaik MC-LAG is not supported (unl

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability

2016-12-22 Thread Alberto Santos
Hi, last time a colleague checked the PR list, VC had more issues than MC LAG. How your L2 setup looks like? Do you configure STP on your L2 network ? which version? make sure the STP version you have today is officially supported by juniper when you implement it. if you have any routing protocol

[j-nsp] MC-LAG reliability

2016-12-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
Hey! How reliable should MC-LAG be considered on EX and QFX series (in a pure L2 setup)? I had a few bad experiences with virtual chassis where a hiccup usually translates to both switches becoming unavailable. This is pretty rare of course. MC-LAG would avoid those coordinated faults but is it o