On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 08:21 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> There was a presentation years ago at IETF where Cisco showed
> the performance increases of enabling path mtu discovery and how this
> took those bgp message sizes grew from the cisco default to match your
> link mtu.
I find it interes
I believe that the problem for this dilemma is fairly simple - the
use of path-mtu-discovery allows you to use the maximum mtu size
supported on the network.
Amos
On Apr 16, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:38AM -0400, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
>> On Mon,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:38AM -0400, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 10:32 +0100, Alex wrote:
> > Jared,
> > Max BGP message size is 4096 bytes anyway and I cannot possibly see how 9K
> > MTU can further increase tcp performance in case of iBGP in comparison with
> > MTU of 447
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 10:32 +0100, Alex wrote:
> Jared,
> Max BGP message size is 4096 bytes anyway and I cannot possibly see how 9K
> MTU can further increase tcp performance in case of iBGP in comparison with
> MTU of 4470.
> Rgds
> Alex
It's sometimes foolish to run iBGP sessions with a TCP M
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MPLS-in-MPLS mtu
> there should be no reason you can't increase your 'mpls infrastructure'
> MTU to something larger, eg: 4470 or otherwise. Some providers have gone
> as
> far as
With 1524 to 1530 of MTU size should works, but remember you will need
to increase the MTU on your Switch too..
Greetings :)
Jonas Frey escribió:
> Jared,
>
> i've done this on most of my network. However the 12 port FE pic
> (P/PE-12FE-TX) only does 1532 bytes max MTU (and this only with newer
Jared,
i've done this on most of my network. However the 12 port FE pic
(P/PE-12FE-TX) only does 1532 bytes max MTU (and this only with newer
firmware...). This is why i am asking.
Regards,
Jonas
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 23:17, Jared Mauch wrote:
> there should be no reason you can't increase
there should be no reason you can't increase your 'mpls infrastructure'
MTU to something larger, eg: 4470 or otherwise. Some providers have gone as
far as increasing the internal MTU to the 9k range. This can have some
serious wins in some cases, eg: tcp performance as it relates to
ibgp
Hello,
i'am looking to deploy a vlan-ccc l2circuit (via MPLS). The customer
wants to use MPLS himself on this circuit so i am wondering what MTU
would be needed for this to work. I am calculating with 1526 bytes, is
this correct?
Any help appreciated.
Regards,
Jonas
9 matches
Mail list logo
