I'm curious if anyone has been using MX's in a VC config. It's supported on the
new MPC blades, but supposedly not with the older DPCs.
I haven't done any testing yet, just minimal research.
Why would I want to? Well, I'm after redundancy with my services blades.
Specifically, MS-DPCs. I've
On (2013-01-10 14:53 +), OBrien, Will wrote:
I'm curious if anyone has been using MX's in a VC config. It's supported on
the new MPC blades, but supposedly not with the older DPCs.
I haven't done any testing yet, just minimal research.
Why would I want to? Well, I'm after redundancy
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-01-10 14:53 +), OBrien, Will wrote:
I'm curious if anyone has been using MX's in a VC config. It's supported on
the new MPC blades, but supposedly not with the older DPCs.
I haven't done any testing yet, just
On (2013-01-10 12:41 -0500), Darius Jahandarie wrote:
With multi-chassis technology you can gain something which was not
possible without it, namely the ability to protect against total
hardware failure of your direct uplink switch/router by using an
MC-LAG to your server.
If your server is
4 matches
Mail list logo
