Re: [j-nsp] MX10K3 Experiences, ~2 years later

The pleasure and joy of a new box. Mark. On 21/Dec/19 15:30, Eldon Koyle wrote: > Replace absurd with unexpected, then. > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MX10K3 Experiences, ~2 years later

Replace absurd with unexpected, then. -- Eldon On Sat, Dec 21, 2019, 02:15 Saku Ytti wrote: > Many absurd things will become reasonable and logical when they are > sufficiently understood. > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 17:22, Eldon Koyle > wrote: > > > > My biggest complaint about the mx10003

Re: [j-nsp] MX10K3 Experiences, ~2 years later

Many absurd things will become reasonable and logical when they are sufficiently understood. On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 17:22, Eldon Koyle wrote: > > My biggest complaint about the mx10003 is the absurd port restrictions. If > you use pic-level config, you can run all ports at 40G or 4x10G, but if

Re: [j-nsp] MX10K3 Experiences, ~2 years later

My biggest complaint about the mx10003 is the absurd port restrictions. If you use pic-level config, you can run all ports at 40G or 4x10G, but if you want to use port-level speed config you have to set one of every 4 ports to 100G on pic 1 in each slot to be able to use all of the ports. Be

Re: [j-nsp] MX10K3 Experiences, ~2 years later

On 18/Dec/19 19:47, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to follow up on a thread from a couple of years ago about the MX10003 > > https://lists.gt.net/nsp/juniper/63670?search_string=mx10003 > > We’ve got a bunch of MX204s that we use for peering and transit over LDP > based L3VPN pinned up

[j-nsp] MX10K3 Experiences, ~2 years later

Hi, I wanted to follow up on a thread from a couple of years ago about the MX10003 https://lists.gt.net/nsp/juniper/63670?search_string=mx10003 We’ve got a bunch of MX204s that we use for peering and transit over LDP based L3VPN pinned up with IS-IS and BFD. We’re quite happy with these boxes