We are running IPSEC on MXs quite extensively and it has been fairly stable.
SRXs are good for IPSEC but depending on your performance requirement they
may not be able to scale well. MX80 IPSEC performance is much better than
SRX.
Configuration wise very similar as M7i or J series.
On Wed, Apr
I do.
And would recommend you to stick to SRX instead. It'll probably be much
cheaper as well.
MX/MS-MIC works but I've spent too much time to get to that point. It's
less documented, less used so Google can't help you, it's different, it
doesn't play well with others, it was probably
I doubt if MX80 has more capacity interms of ipsec performance. What
numbers are you refering to?
Regards
Asad
On 29 Apr 2015 15:24, ashish verma ashish.s...@gmail.com wrote:
We are running IPSEC on MXs quite extensively and it has been fairly
stable.
SRXs are good for IPSEC but depending on
Hi, depending on the packet size the mx will provide with higher throughput
than the low/med range SRXs
Regards
Santiago
Sent from my iPhone
On 29 Apr 2015, at 13:27, Asad Raza asadgard...@gmail.com wrote:
I doubt if MX80 has more capacity interms of ipsec performance. What
numbers are
4 matches
Mail list logo