Re: [j-nsp] MX80 IPSEC VPN

2015-04-29 Thread ashish verma
We are running IPSEC on MXs quite extensively and it has been fairly stable. SRXs are good for IPSEC but depending on your performance requirement they may not be able to scale well. MX80 IPSEC performance is much better than SRX. Configuration wise very similar as M7i or J series. On Wed, Apr

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 IPSEC VPN

2015-04-29 Thread Stepan Kucherenko
I do. And would recommend you to stick to SRX instead. It'll probably be much cheaper as well. MX/MS-MIC works but I've spent too much time to get to that point. It's less documented, less used so Google can't help you, it's different, it doesn't play well with others, it was probably

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 IPSEC VPN

2015-04-29 Thread Asad Raza
I doubt if MX80 has more capacity interms of ipsec performance. What numbers are you refering to? Regards Asad On 29 Apr 2015 15:24, ashish verma ashish.s...@gmail.com wrote: We are running IPSEC on MXs quite extensively and it has been fairly stable. SRXs are good for IPSEC but depending on

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 IPSEC VPN

2015-04-29 Thread Santiago Martinez
Hi, depending on the packet size the mx will provide with higher throughput than the low/med range SRXs Regards Santiago Sent from my iPhone On 29 Apr 2015, at 13:27, Asad Raza asadgard...@gmail.com wrote: I doubt if MX80 has more capacity interms of ipsec performance. What numbers are