You are aware of what kind of testing we are talking about with Miercom and
Tolly..?
The tests are paid for by one vendor in order to typically put focus on some
corner case problem in another vendors equipment.
I am not saying that the specific results obtained are wrong, but it is
probably very interesting to see the test parameters and configurations used in
the test to be able to verify how realistic they are for real-world scenarios.
"Information contained in this report is based upon results observed a Cisco
facility in San Jose, CA. Test cases were based on parameters set by Cisco."
Thanks,
///Markus Åberg
-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
Sent: 24. syyskuuta 2009 8:46
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Miercom Competitive Performance Testing Results: CiscoASR9000
vs Juniper MX960
Hi,
Would be interesting to see Juniper's reaction on following report:
http://www.miercom.com/dl.html?fid=20090827&type=report
Cheers,
Jeff
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
