Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-21 Thread Pavel Lunin
/Gustav > > > > *Från:* Pavel Lunin [mailto:plu...@gmail.com] > *Skickat:* den 20 september 2017 21:31 > *Till:* Gustav Ulander > *Kopia:* juniper-nsp ; Chris Morrow < > morr...@ops-netman.net>; William > *Ämne:* Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300 > > > > VRs o

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Chris Morrow
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:29:44 -0400, Jason Healy wrote: > > > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Chris Morrow wrote: > > > > man.. I'd like to take a gander at your setup.. because I'm fairly > > certain I'm going to send this 3400 back and work out my anger on some > > firewood. :) > > Mail it m

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Jason Healy
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Chris Morrow wrote: > > man.. I'd like to take a gander at your setup.. because I'm fairly > certain I'm going to send this 3400 back and work out my anger on some > firewood. :) Mail it my way; I'd be happy to have a spare! I probably have a few 3200s left for

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 21/09/2017, at 4:16 AM, William wrote: > > Hi list, > > We currently have the EX2200-48P deployed across our building in various > stacks/non stacks and it has served us well, abit slow to commit in a stack > but still been ok! > > Due to the ex2200 going eol/eos we are looking at the EX2

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Gustav Ulander
; William Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300 VRs on a basic enterprise access switch? You guys are really crazy. "Gustav Ulander" mailto:gustav.ulan...@telecomputing.se>>: Yea lets make the customers job harder partly by not supporting old features in the next incarnation of the

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Chuck Anderson
av > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] För William > Skickat: den 20 september 2017 21:10 > Till: Chris Morrow > Kopia: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300 > > Thanks to all the rep

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Pavel Lunin
a: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300 Thanks to all the replies so far! Regarding a VC Licence - https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/ concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e59 Here are the features which require a EFL: Bid

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Gustav Ulander
at other platforms... //Gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] För William Skickat: den 20 september 2017 21:10 Till: Chris Morrow Kopia: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300 Thanks to all the replies so

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread William
Thanks to all the replies so far! Regarding a VC Licence - https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e59 Here are the features which require a EFL: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) IGMP (Internet Group Management Protoco

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Chris Morrow
At Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:03:21 +, Raphael Maunier wrote: > > Not supported at all. > > According to a meeting last week, hardware limitation … EX2200 or > 3400 but no support of BGP, if bgp is needed EX3300 / 4300 > I found the 3400's are painfully different from 3300/3200's.. with respect t

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Raphael Maunier
Not supported at all. According to a meeting last week, hardware limitation … EX2200 or 3400 but no support of BGP, if bgp is needed EX3300 / 4300 On 20/09/2017, 18:01, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Chuck Anderson" wrote: Is virtual-router at least supported if not full VRF? On Wed,

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Chuck Anderson
Is virtual-router at least supported if not full VRF? On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:26:27PM +0100, Olivier Benghozi wrote: > New additional licence needed to stack (VirtualChassis), VRF not supported. > > > On 20 sept. 2017 at 17:16, William wrote : > > > > Due to the ex2200 going eol/eos we are l

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Matt Freitag
My biggest initial gotcha was the difference between "original" Junos and Junos with "ELS" in the EX2300's. If you haven't gone through it yet http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.2/topics/task/configuration/getting-started-els.html is worth a read. Matt Freitag Network Engineer Inf

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Olivier Benghozi
New additional licence needed to stack (VirtualChassis), VRF not supported. > On 20 sept. 2017 at 17:16, William wrote : > > Due to the ex2200 going eol/eos we are looking at the EX2300 - can anyone > share their experience with this model? Anything to watch out for? ___

[j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread William
Hi list, We currently have the EX2200-48P deployed across our building in various stacks/non stacks and it has served us well, abit slow to commit in a stack but still been ok! Due to the ex2200 going eol/eos we are looking at the EX2300 - can anyone share their experience with this model? Anythi