Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-21 Thread Pavel Lunin
> > > *Från:* Pavel Lunin [mailto:plu...@gmail.com] > *Skickat:* den 20 september 2017 21:31 > *Till:* Gustav Ulander <gustav.ulan...@telecomputing.se> > *Kopia:* juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Chris Morrow < > morr...@ops-netman.net>; Wi

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Chris Morrow
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:29:44 -0400, Jason Healy wrote: > > > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Chris Morrow wrote: > > > > man.. I'd like to take a gander at your setup.. because I'm fairly > > certain I'm going to send this 3400 back and work out my

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Jason Healy
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Chris Morrow wrote: > > man.. I'd like to take a gander at your setup.. because I'm fairly > certain I'm going to send this 3400 back and work out my anger on some > firewood. :) Mail it my way; I'd be happy to have a spare! I probably

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 21/09/2017, at 4:16 AM, William wrote: > > Hi list, > > We currently have the EX2200-48P deployed across our building in various > stacks/non stacks and it has served us well, abit slow to commit in a stack > but still been ok! > > Due to the ex2200 going eol/eos we are

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Gustav Ulander
Kopia: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net>; William <wil...@gmail.com> Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300 VRs on a basic enterprise access switch? You guys are really crazy. "Gustav Ulander" <gustav.ulan..

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Chuck Anderson
forms... > > //Gustav > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] För William > Skickat: den 20 september 2017 21:10 > Till: Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net> > Kopia: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Ämne:

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Pavel Lunin
ember 2017 21:10 Till: Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net> Kopia: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300 Thanks to all the replies so far! Regarding a VC Licence - https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/ concept/ex-series-software-licenses-over

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Gustav Ulander
at other platforms... //Gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] För William Skickat: den 20 september 2017 21:10 Till: Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net> Kopia: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread William
Thanks to all the replies so far! Regarding a VC Licence - https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e59 Here are the features which require a EFL: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) IGMP (Internet Group Management

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Chris Morrow
At Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:03:21 +, Raphael Maunier wrote: > > Not supported at all. > > According to a meeting last week, hardware limitation … EX2200 or > 3400 but no support of BGP, if bgp is needed EX3300 / 4300 > I found the 3400's are painfully different from

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Raphael Maunier
Not supported at all. According to a meeting last week, hardware limitation … EX2200 or 3400 but no support of BGP, if bgp is needed EX3300 / 4300 On 20/09/2017, 18:01, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Chuck Anderson" wrote: Is

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Chuck Anderson
Is virtual-router at least supported if not full VRF? On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:26:27PM +0100, Olivier Benghozi wrote: > New additional licence needed to stack (VirtualChassis), VRF not supported. > > > On 20 sept. 2017 at 17:16, William wrote : > > > > Due to the ex2200

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread Olivier Benghozi
New additional licence needed to stack (VirtualChassis), VRF not supported. > On 20 sept. 2017 at 17:16, William wrote : > > Due to the ex2200 going eol/eos we are looking at the EX2300 - can anyone > share their experience with this model? Anything to watch out for?

[j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

2017-09-20 Thread William
Hi list, We currently have the EX2200-48P deployed across our building in various stacks/non stacks and it has served us well, abit slow to commit in a stack but still been ok! Due to the ex2200 going eol/eos we are looking at the EX2300 - can anyone share their experience with this model?