>
>
> *Från:* Pavel Lunin [mailto:plu...@gmail.com]
> *Skickat:* den 20 september 2017 21:31
> *Till:* Gustav Ulander <gustav.ulan...@telecomputing.se>
> *Kopia:* juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Chris Morrow <
> morr...@ops-netman.net>; Wi
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:29:44 -0400,
Jason Healy wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 20, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Chris Morrow wrote:
> >
> > man.. I'd like to take a gander at your setup.. because I'm fairly
> > certain I'm going to send this 3400 back and work out my
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Chris Morrow wrote:
>
> man.. I'd like to take a gander at your setup.. because I'm fairly
> certain I'm going to send this 3400 back and work out my anger on some
> firewood. :)
Mail it my way; I'd be happy to have a spare! I probably
> On 21/09/2017, at 4:16 AM, William wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> We currently have the EX2200-48P deployed across our building in various
> stacks/non stacks and it has served us well, abit slow to commit in a stack
> but still been ok!
>
> Due to the ex2200 going eol/eos we are
Kopia: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Chris Morrow
<morr...@ops-netman.net>; William <wil...@gmail.com>
Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300
VRs on a basic enterprise access switch? You guys are really crazy.
"Gustav Ulander"
<gustav.ulan..
forms...
>
> //Gustav
>
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] För William
> Skickat: den 20 september 2017 21:10
> Till: Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net>
> Kopia: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Ämne:
ember 2017 21:10
Till: Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net>
Kopia: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300
Thanks to all the replies so far!
Regarding a VC Licence -
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/
concept/ex-series-software-licenses-over
at other
platforms...
//Gustav
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] För William
Skickat: den 20 september 2017 21:10
Till: Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net>
Kopia: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto
Thanks to all the replies so far!
Regarding a VC Licence -
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e59
Here are the features which require a EFL:
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
IGMP (Internet Group Management
At Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:03:21 +,
Raphael Maunier wrote:
>
> Not supported at all.
>
> According to a meeting last week, hardware limitation … EX2200 or
> 3400 but no support of BGP, if bgp is needed EX3300 / 4300
>
I found the 3400's are painfully different from
Not supported at all.
According to a meeting last week, hardware limitation … EX2200 or 3400 but no
support of BGP, if bgp is needed EX3300 / 4300
On 20/09/2017, 18:01, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Chuck Anderson"
wrote:
Is
Is virtual-router at least supported if not full VRF?
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:26:27PM +0100, Olivier Benghozi wrote:
> New additional licence needed to stack (VirtualChassis), VRF not supported.
>
> > On 20 sept. 2017 at 17:16, William wrote :
> >
> > Due to the ex2200
New additional licence needed to stack (VirtualChassis), VRF not supported.
> On 20 sept. 2017 at 17:16, William wrote :
>
> Due to the ex2200 going eol/eos we are looking at the EX2300 - can anyone
> share their experience with this model? Anything to watch out for?
Hi list,
We currently have the EX2200-48P deployed across our building in various
stacks/non stacks and it has served us well, abit slow to commit in a stack
but still been ok!
Due to the ex2200 going eol/eos we are looking at the EX2300 - can anyone
share their experience with this model?
14 matches
Mail list logo