Re: [j-nsp] Multiple usage of VRRP-Groups (JunOS)

2009-07-08 Thread Terry Baranski
Andrew Cheng wrote: > is it okay to use the same VRRP-group (i.e. 20) multiple > times on the same physical interface? > > We want to use more than 255 VLANs on an physical interface > so we have to use the same group several times or use the > same VRRP-group (i.e. > 1) on every VLAN subunit. I

Re: [j-nsp] Multiple usage of VRRP-Groups (JunOS)

2009-07-08 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:05:04PM +0200, Hendrik Kahmann wrote: > We want to use more than 255 VLANs on an physical interface so we have to > use the same group several times or use the same VRRP-group (i.e. 1) on > every VLAN subunit. That's no problem as long as your L2 cloud properly learns

Re: [j-nsp] Multiple usage of VRRP-Groups (JunOS)

2009-07-08 Thread Thomas Eichhorn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Hendrik, this should be no problem, having the same vrrp-group in different vlans. Kind regards to Oldenburg ;) Tom Hendrik Kahmann schrieb: > Hello, > > is it okay to use the same VRRP-group (i.e. 20) multiple times on the > same physical inte

Re: [j-nsp] Multiple usage of VRRP-Groups (JunOS)

2009-07-08 Thread Malte von dem Hagen
Hi, Hendrik Kahmann schrieb: > is it okay to use the same VRRP-group (i.e. 20) multiple times on the > same physical interface? IIRC, the vrrp-group identifier works via the mac address of the vrrp packets, so it has to be unique for each broadcast domain. > We want to use more than 255 VLANs

[j-nsp] Multiple usage of VRRP-Groups (JunOS)

2009-07-08 Thread Hendrik Kahmann
Hello, is it okay to use the same VRRP-group (i.e. 20) multiple times on the same physical interface? We want to use more than 255 VLANs on an physical interface so we have to use the same group several times or use the same VRRP-group (i.e. 1) on every VLAN subunit. Kind regards, Hen