Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX

2007-02-20 Thread Leigh Porter
Sorry folks, not sure where this hid for all that time! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leigh Porter Sent: 20 February 2007 14:17 To: Pekka Savola; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX It is

Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX

2007-02-20 Thread Leigh Porter
avola Sent: 01 February 2007 19:44 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > Aka everyone wants a cool new "40G interface", but nobody wants to > actually pay the price for true 40G seri

Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX

2007-02-01 Thread Pekka Savola
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > Aka everyone wants a cool new "40G interface", but nobody wants to > actually pay the price for true 40G serial optics when 10G is the biggest > thing available as a cheap commodity. Now if only someone could explain > this to the 100GE crowd. :P

Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX

2007-02-01 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:58:45PM +0100, Niels Bakker wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (German Martinez) [Thu 01 Feb 2007, 15:42 CET]: > >http://www.juniper.net/company/newsletter/jnews_article_070101.html > > > >What will be the diffence of running this or running 4 links in > >paralel? > > Three f

Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX

2007-02-01 Thread michael.firth
erfaces or IP layer load balancing. Regards Michael > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > German Martinez > Sent: 01 February 2007 14:46 > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Optical integrati

Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX

2007-02-01 Thread Niels Bakker
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (German Martinez) [Thu 01 Feb 2007, 15:42 CET]: >http://www.juniper.net/company/newsletter/jnews_article_070101.html > >What will be the diffence of running this or running 4 links in >paralel? Three fibers, looks like. And some bad-ass handwaving about alien waveforms.

Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX

2007-02-01 Thread Paul Goyette
This PIC allows you to run 4 links in parallel, with the parallelism at the physical layer. It appears to higher layers as a single 40Gb/sec link. You could, of course, run 4 separate links (as in an aggregated interface) but that provide the parallelism at layer 2. Or, of course, you could op

[j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX

2007-02-01 Thread German Martinez
Hello, Could someone from Juniper comment about this article? http://www.juniper.net/company/newsletter/jnews_article_070101.html What will be the diffence of running this or running 4 links in paralel? Thanks! German ___ juniper-nsp mailing list junip