I guess it is logical and I was hoping to be able to make my life easier :-).
I did my tests with without FIB indirect-nexthops. No change in behaviour.
Vladi
On 2 Sep 2013, at 23:47, Daniel Roesen d...@cluenet.de wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:26:46PM +0100, Vladislav A. VASILEV wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know if the from next-hop match condition is supported in
policies, applied to the forwarding table?
Thanks,
Vladislav A. VASILEV
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Figured it out. My intention was to filter routes by performing matches
against each protocol next hop. However, this is not supported when the
policy is applied under routing-options forwarding-table export. Has
anyone seen this documented anywhere on juniper.net?
Regards,
Vladislav A. VASILEV
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:26:46PM +0100, Vladislav A. VASILEV wrote:
Figured it out. My intention was to filter routes by performing matches
against each protocol next hop. However, this is not supported when the
policy is applied under routing-options forwarding-table export. Has
anyone seen
4 matches
Mail list logo