Re: [j-nsp] Parallel BGP sessions for v6 prefixes over v4 and v6

2024-07-23 Thread Andrey Kostin via juniper-nsp
Andrey Kostin писал(а) 2024-07-23 16:27: Andrey Kostin via juniper-nsp писал(а) 2024-07-09 10:10: Correction, rib-group with policy is used to copy received prefixes to inet6.0 on in-line route-reflectors. For off-ramp RRs to place prefixes into inet6.3 it's enough to configure this: set prot

Re: [j-nsp] Parallel BGP sessions for v6 prefixes over v4 and v6

2024-07-23 Thread Andrey Kostin via juniper-nsp
Andrey Kostin via juniper-nsp писал(а) 2024-07-09 10:10: [...] The problem here is that route-reflector selects a path with ipv4 mapped nexthop and advertises it over ipv6 session. I'm wondering, is anybody already encountered this problem and found a solution how to make a RR to advertise p

Re: [j-nsp] Parallel BGP sessions for v6 prefixes over v4 and v6

2024-07-09 Thread Andrey Kostin via juniper-nsp
Alexandre Snarskii писал(а) 2024-07-09 07:25: On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 11:33:48AM -0400, Andrey Kostin via juniper-nsp wrote: [...] The problem here is that route-reflector selects a path with ipv4 mapped nexthop and advertises it over ipv6 session. I'm wondering, is anybody already encountered

Re: [j-nsp] Parallel BGP sessions for v6 prefixes over v4 and v6

2024-07-09 Thread Alexandre Snarskii via juniper-nsp
On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 11:33:48AM -0400, Andrey Kostin via juniper-nsp wrote: [...] > The problem here is that route-reflector selects a path with ipv4 mapped > nexthop and advertises it over ipv6 session. I'm wondering, is anybody > already encountered this problem and found a solution how to m

[j-nsp] Parallel BGP sessions for v6 prefixes over v4 and v6

2024-07-08 Thread Andrey Kostin via juniper-nsp
Hi juniper-nsp readers, Recently we encountered an issue with L3-incompletes counters started incrementing on internal backbone links. It began after adding new PE, core routers and route-reflectors. After quite long investigation with TAC involved the problem was identified: v6 traffic was