Re: [j-nsp] Prefix independent convergence and FIB backup path

> Of Mark Smith > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2018 12:02 PM > > Hi list, > > Test topology below. 2x MX80 with dual ip transit (full table ~600k prefixes). > TRA1 preferred over TRA2 (Localpref 200 set by PE1 import policy). Plain > unlabeled inet.0, no mpls in use. In lab topology both

Re: [j-nsp] Prefix independent convergence and FIB backup path

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Olivier Benghozi wrote: > Here (VPNv4/v6, BGP PIC Core + PIC Edge, no addpath as not supported in vpn > AFI) we can see that, when possible: > active eBGP path is backuped via iBGP path > active iBGP path is backuped via another iBGP

Re: [j-nsp] Prefix independent convergence and FIB backup path

Here (VPNv4/v6, BGP PIC Core + PIC Edge, no addpath as not supported in vpn > AFI) we can see that, when possible: > No need for add-path in a VRF in fact. You always had it "for free" with per PE route-distinguishers. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] Prefix independent convergence and FIB backup path

Hi Mark, Here (VPNv4/v6, BGP PIC Core + PIC Edge, no addpath as not supported in vpn AFI) we can see that, when possible: active eBGP path is backuped via iBGP path active iBGP path is backuped via another iBGP path We don't see: active iBGP backuped via inactive eBGP active eBGP backuped via

Re: [j-nsp] Prefix independent convergence and FIB backup path

ael > >> -Original Message- >> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf >> Of Mark Smith >> Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 6:02 AM >> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> Subject: [j-nsp] Prefix independent convergence

Re: [j-nsp] Prefix independent convergence and FIB backup path

p-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > Of Mark Smith > Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 6:02 AM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Prefix independent convergence and FIB backup path > > Hi list, > > Test topology below. 2x MX80 with dual ip transit (full table ~600k > pr