Reviewing my old emails, I noticed that I didn't give the final overview of
the case. The problem was resolved in 2021 by the team that takes care of
server virtualization. The root of the problem was updating a package
relating to the XCP-NG system network. After they isolated the update, the
IRQ
When there was an exhaustion of IPv4 LPM routes in spine2, I noticed a
greater increase in IRQs. I analyzed tcpdump and found nothing strange
on the server itself.
It reduces the L3 routes sent to the spines and released more slots in
the L2 profile below.
Profile active: l2-profile-three
Type
How are you measuring IRQ on the servers? If it's network related IRQs, it
should be seen during a packet capture.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:40 PM Cristian Cardoso <
cristian.cardos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I running 19.1R2.8 version on Junos.
> Today I was in contact with Juniper support about a
I running 19.1R2.8 version on Junos.
Today I was in contact with Juniper support about a route depletion
problem and it seems to be related to the IRQs problem.
When the IPv4 / IPv6 routes are exhausted in the LTM table, the IRQ
increment begins.
I did an analysis of the packages trafficked on the
Looks ok to me
Which junos version you are running ? and which devices ?
Did you capture on the servers to see what is the traffic that causes the
high CPU utilization ?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:07 PM Cristian Cardoso <
cristian.cardos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > show configuration protocols evpn
> show configuration protocols evpn
vni-options {
vni 810 {
vrf-target target:888:888;
}
vni 815 {
vrf-target target:888:888;
}
vni 821 {
vrf-target target:888:888;
}
vni 822 {
vrf-target target:888:888;
}
vni 827 {
Can you show your irb and protocols evpn configuration please
Nitzan
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 3:26 PM Cristian Cardoso <
cristian.cardos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone use EVPN-VXLAN in the Centrally-Routed and Bridging topology?
> I have two spine switches and two leaf switches, when I use
Does anyone use EVPN-VXLAN in the Centrally-Routed and Bridging topology?
I have two spine switches and two leaf switches, when I use the
virtual-gateway in active / active mode in the spines, the servers
connected only in leaf1 have a large increase in IRQ's, generating
higher CPU consumption in
8 matches
Mail list logo
