Re: [j-nsp] RPD soft assertion failed

2009-06-02 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote: > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:01 +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote: > > JTAC has decoded the core dumps and on initial analysis it appears to > > match PR 448745 - RPD core at krt_inh_lock_internal. The PR doesn't > > mention 9.3 as affecte

Re: [j-nsp] RPD soft assertion failed

2009-06-02 Thread Daniel Verlouw
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:01 +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote: > JTAC has decoded the core dumps and on initial analysis it appears to > match PR 448745 - RPD core at krt_inh_lock_internal. The PR doesn't > mention 9.3 as affected though. I'll keep the list posted on any > progress. JTAC is now sa

Re: [j-nsp] RPD soft assertion failed

2009-05-27 Thread Daniel Verlouw
Hi Richard, On May 27, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: I had a similar issue (well the exact same message, but I'm assuming different root causes) back in 8.2R2. It turned out to be PR99220, and was mostly cosmetic (minus the big scary log message that looked like a rpd core du

Re: [j-nsp] RPD soft assertion failed

2009-05-27 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:49:28AM +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote: > Hi, > > anyone else seeing messages similar to the following? We started seeing > several of these after upgrading one of our M120s to 9.3R3.8 last night. > > May 27 10:28:05.806 2009 jun1.bit-1 rpd[1149]: % > DAEMON-3-RPD_ASSERT_

[j-nsp] RPD soft assertion failed

2009-05-27 Thread Daniel Verlouw
Hi, anyone else seeing messages similar to the following? We started seeing several of these after upgrading one of our M120s to 9.3R3.8 last night. May 27 10:28:05.806 2009 jun1.bit-1 rpd[1149]: % DAEMON-3-RPD_ASSERT_SOFT: Soft assertion failed rpd[1149]: file "../../../../../src/juniper/usr.sb