On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:01 +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote:
> > JTAC has decoded the core dumps and on initial analysis it appears to
> > match PR 448745 - RPD core at krt_inh_lock_internal. The PR doesn't
> > mention 9.3 as affecte
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:01 +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote:
> JTAC has decoded the core dumps and on initial analysis it appears to
> match PR 448745 - RPD core at krt_inh_lock_internal. The PR doesn't
> mention 9.3 as affected though. I'll keep the list posted on any
> progress.
JTAC is now sa
Hi Richard,
On May 27, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
I had a similar issue (well the exact same message, but I'm assuming
different root causes) back in 8.2R2. It turned out to be PR99220, and
was mostly cosmetic (minus the big scary log message that looked
like a
rpd core du
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:49:28AM +0200, Daniel Verlouw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anyone else seeing messages similar to the following? We started seeing
> several of these after upgrading one of our M120s to 9.3R3.8 last night.
>
> May 27 10:28:05.806 2009 jun1.bit-1 rpd[1149]: %
> DAEMON-3-RPD_ASSERT_
Hi,
anyone else seeing messages similar to the following? We started seeing
several of these after upgrading one of our M120s to 9.3R3.8 last night.
May 27 10:28:05.806 2009 jun1.bit-1 rpd[1149]: %
DAEMON-3-RPD_ASSERT_SOFT: Soft assertion failed rpd[1149]: file
"../../../../../src/juniper/usr.sb
5 matches
Mail list logo