Re: [j-nsp] SRX Is 12.3X48 already mature?

2016-01-25 Thread Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
Hi Christian, Exactly, ISSU aborts just after checking conformity of the configuration with the targeted OS version. JTAC was unable to give us an rational explanation about this. Best regards. 2016-01-26 8:38 GMT+01:00 Christian Beyerlein < christian.beyerlein+juniper-...@net-m.de>: > Thx

[j-nsp] SRX Is 12.3X48 already mature?

2016-01-25 Thread Christian Beyerlein
Hi! Does anyone already use 12.3X48 on datacenter SRX (SRX3600 HA)? We are currently on 12.1X44 and would like to skip 12.1X46 and 12.1X47, but 12.3X48 is not yet "JTAC recommended". Any stability issues observed? Will ISSU work from 12.1X44? We use only basic features, FW/NAT and ALG for

Re: [j-nsp] SRX Is 12.3X48 already mature?

2016-01-25 Thread Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
Hi, Just upgraded an SRX5600 HA cluster from 12.1X46-D20 to 12.3X48-20 without any problem... so far (3 weeks ;-). Only issue we encountered was with ISSU not accepting too much lt interfaces between multiple L-SYSs, there is a listed PR in junos 12.3X48 release notes. No matter what we tried