Re: [j-nsp] SRX asymmetric routing on WAN side

2015-11-17 Thread Michael Gehrmann
Hi Rolf, Is the purpose of the second WAN interface backup or a different path for some routes? In either case routing will determine the outbound interface in the WAN zone. It's the zone that is important for sessions not interface. The interface is merely cached in the session for fast-path to

Re: [j-nsp] SRX asymmetric routing on WAN side

2015-11-13 Thread Ivan Ivanov
Hi Rolf, The traffic in your case will be accepted by default regardless of the interface. You don't need to do anything to permit it. You have to permit explicitly only if the traffic is transmitted between two interfaces even they are in the same zone. I cannot find a link for a proof, though.

[j-nsp] SRX asymmetric routing on WAN side

2015-11-13 Thread Rolf Hanßen
Hi, I have a quite simple setup, SRX with a WAN connection and some LAN stuff. WAN is single-homed. I now want to add a second uplink interface and put it into the existing WAN/untrust zone. So the traffic may flow async (interface point of view) but sync (zone point of view). Will this require an