On 17/08/15 08:58, Stepan Kucherenko wrote:
No. Just don't.
SRX has 1 weak MIPS CPU for control plane and it's incredibly slow
(commits took ages). Just get a couple of vMX/vRR and use them as a
VM on a non-outdated x86 server, it'll work great.
Agreed. They're nice cheap boxes for a range of
No. Just don't.
SRX has 1 weak MIPS CPU for control plane and it's incredibly slow
(commits took ages). Just get a couple of vMX/vRR and use them as a VM
on a non-outdated x86 server, it'll work great.
On 17.08.2015 08:34, Alex K. wrote:
Hello all,
One of my colleagues suggested using
Hello all,
One of my colleagues suggested using SRX240 us a route-reflector in our
network.
Since I've never seen SRX in such deployment, I'll be glad to know your
opinion on that.
The requirements are - MPLS VPN, L2VPN support (both VPLS and Pseudo wires)
and multicast VRFs support. It is
On 17/Aug/15 07:34, Alex K. wrote:
Hello all,
One of my colleagues suggested using SRX240 us a route-reflector in our
network.
Since I've never seen SRX in such deployment, I'll be glad to know your
opinion on that.
The requirements are - MPLS VPN, L2VPN support (both VPLS and Pseudo
4 matches
Mail list logo
