Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-28 Thread Harris Hui
Subject: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question. We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out and just to bang on. Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very simple BGP config (like say sending a few /22's and receiving a default route) and RIP/OSPF? Seems we

Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-27 Thread Phil Mayers
On 27/07/11 02:38, Tim Jackson wrote: Anybody tested the throughput on these in packet mode only? I got well over 600mbit/sec out of an SRX210. No appreciable CPU use or sluggishness at the CLI. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-27 Thread Phil Mayers
On 27/07/11 00:26, Keith wrote: We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out and just to bang on. Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very simple BGP config (like say sending a few /22's and receiving a default route) and RIP/OSPF? Yeah, the SRX210

Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-27 Thread Jensen Tyler
Of Keith Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:27 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question. We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out and just to bang on. Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very simple BGP config (like say sending

Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-27 Thread Harris Hui
have it in packet-mode though. Jensen Tyler -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Keith Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:27 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question. We need

Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-27 Thread Craig Whitmore
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Keith Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:27 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question. We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out and just to bang on. Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very

[j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-26 Thread Keith
We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out and just to bang on. Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very simple BGP config (like say sending a few /22's and receiving a default route) and RIP/OSPF? Seems we can pick up an SRX for 600-2000 depending

Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-26 Thread OBrien, Will
I use 240s for a bgp connected network. Even a 100 will work, but the 240 is superior. You can even cluster them Will O'Brien On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Keith kwo...@citywest.ca wrote: We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out and just to bang on. Is the SRX

Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-26 Thread Bill Blackford
Used 210's and 220 that were running BGP, OSPF and NAT (both static and pools) all simultaneously. They do well. -b On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Keith kwo...@citywest.ca wrote: We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out and just to bang on. Is the SRX line,

Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-26 Thread Tim Jackson
Anybody tested the throughput on these in packet mode only? On Jul 26, 2011 8:26 PM, Bill Blackford bblackf...@gmail.com wrote: Used 210's and 220 that were running BGP, OSPF and NAT (both static and pools) all simultaneously. They do well. -b On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Keith

Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.

2011-07-26 Thread Paul Stewart
mode ;) Paul -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Jackson Sent: July-26-11 9:39 PM To: Bill Blackford Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question. Anybody tested the throughput