Subject: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.
We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out
and just to bang on.
Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very simple
BGP config (like say sending a few /22's and receiving a default route)
and RIP/OSPF?
Seems we
On 27/07/11 02:38, Tim Jackson wrote:
Anybody tested the throughput on these in packet mode only?
I got well over 600mbit/sec out of an SRX210. No appreciable CPU use or
sluggishness at the CLI.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
On 27/07/11 00:26, Keith wrote:
We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out
and just to bang on.
Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very simple
BGP config (like say sending a few /22's and receiving a default route)
and RIP/OSPF?
Yeah, the SRX210
Of Keith
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:27 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.
We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out
and just to bang on.
Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very simple
BGP config (like say sending
have it in packet-mode though.
Jensen Tyler
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Keith
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:27 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.
We need
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Keith
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:27 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.
We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out
and just to bang on.
Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very
We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out
and just to bang on.
Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very simple
BGP config (like say sending a few /22's and receiving a default route)
and RIP/OSPF?
Seems we can pick up an SRX for 600-2000 depending
I use 240s for a bgp connected network. Even a 100 will work, but the 240 is
superior. You can even cluster them
Will O'Brien
On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Keith kwo...@citywest.ca wrote:
We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out
and just to bang on.
Is the SRX
Used 210's and 220 that were running BGP, OSPF and NAT (both static
and pools) all simultaneously. They do well.
-b
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Keith kwo...@citywest.ca wrote:
We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out
and just to bang on.
Is the SRX line,
Anybody tested the throughput on these in packet mode only?
On Jul 26, 2011 8:26 PM, Bill Blackford bblackf...@gmail.com wrote:
Used 210's and 220 that were running BGP, OSPF and NAT (both static
and pools) all simultaneously. They do well.
-b
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Keith
mode ;)
Paul
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Jackson
Sent: July-26-11 9:39 PM
To: Bill Blackford
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.
Anybody tested the throughput
11 matches
Mail list logo