Re: [j-nsp] Seeking Input on Rough Scaling for T and M series MPLS PE Terminations

2009-04-21 Thread truman
on Rough Scaling for T and M series MPLS PE Terminations On Tuesday 21 April 2009 01:38:01 pm Truman Boyes wrote: > Depending upon your configurations, the actual scaling > figures may vary. Here are some figures that should help > in rudimentary sizing: you can setup 2000 VPLS inst

Re: [j-nsp] Seeking Input on Rough Scaling for T and M series MPLS PE Terminations

2009-04-20 Thread Mark Tinka
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 01:38:01 pm Truman Boyes wrote: > Depending upon your configurations, the actual scaling > figures may vary. Here are some figures that should help > in rudimentary sizing: you can setup 2000 VPLS instances > w/ 100k MAC addresses; you can setup 32k CCC > connections, and

Re: [j-nsp] Seeking Input on Rough Scaling for T and M series MPLS PE Terminations

2009-04-20 Thread Truman Boyes
Hi There, Depending upon your configurations, the actual scaling figures may vary. Here are some figures that should help in rudimentary sizing: you can setup 2000 VPLS instances w/ 100k MAC addresses; you can setup 32k CCC connections, and somewhere between 2000 - 6000 routing (VRF / v

[j-nsp] Seeking Input on Rough Scaling for T and M series MPLS PE Terminations

2009-04-20 Thread Loopback EZ
All Just wanted to get a feel for the "reasonable" scaling numbers when using an enhanced M or T series Juniper as a PE router. In most cases the PE router has T1 aggregation interfaces on the line side and POS interfaces on the trunk side. Seeking numbers for both MPLS and VPLS services.