Re: [j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-29 Thread Raphael Mazelier
On 29/10/2016 18:26, Roger Wiklund wrote: Hi The question is actually regarding maintenance. I have 40+ dual homed servers, and I need to upgrade the switches. It's not feasible to steer traffic away on each server, therefore I asked about what can be done on the switch itself. In job-1

Re: [j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-29 Thread Saku Ytti
On 29 October 2016 at 08:30, wrote: >> Question was not about outage, but operator removing link from an bundle. > > My understanding is that there is no difference and the same procedure is > invoked during failure i.e. MAC_Operational=False. It's not the same.

Re: [j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-29 Thread Roger Wiklund
Hi The question is actually regarding maintenance. I have 40+ dual homed servers, and I need to upgrade the switches. It's not feasible to steer traffic away on each server, therefore I asked about what can be done on the switch itself. I wanted to know if there is a better way than just

Re: [j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-28 Thread adamv0025
Hi Saku, > From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi] > Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 2:16 AM > > On 29 October 2016 at 02:54, wrote: > > Saku is right there in saying that LACP should have provisions for > > hitless addition and removal of links from bundle. (not

Re: [j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-28 Thread Saku Ytti
On 29 October 2016 at 02:54, wrote: > Saku is right there in saying that LACP should have provisions for hitless > addition and removal of links from bundle. (not quite sure about removal > though, but I'll play along). > But my experience is that's not how it works

Re: [j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-28 Thread adamv0025
> Of Saku Ytti > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 9:20 PM > > On 28 October 2016 at 15:06, Eugeniu Patrascu > wrote: > > If you use LACP on the link, to mitigate the packets loss, set it to > > fast and then just yank the cable from the switch. The traffic will be > > rehashed

Re: [j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-28 Thread Saku Ytti
On 28 October 2016 at 15:06, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote: > If you use LACP on the link, to mitigate the packets loss, set it to fast > and then just yank the cable from the switch. The traffic will be rehashed > on the remaining links and at most you'll lose around 1 second worth

Re: [j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-28 Thread Eugeniu Patrascu
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Roger Wiklund wrote: > Thanks, have you tested this? What happens to traffic/sessions on the > link? Is it non disruptive, or at least less disruptive than disabling > the interface? > Yes, I did. You must also disable it on the remote

Re: [j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-28 Thread Roger Wiklund
Thanks, have you tested this? What happens to traffic/sessions on the link? Is it non disruptive, or at least less disruptive than disabling the interface? /Roger On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Roger Wiklund

Re: [j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-28 Thread Eugeniu Patrascu
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Roger Wiklund wrote: > Hi > > Is there a way to remove one interface from an AE without disabling > the interface? > > I was thinking about removing the 802.3ad aeX config from the > interface but I have not tried it yet. > You

[j-nsp] Soft removal of traffic from AE?

2016-10-28 Thread Roger Wiklund
Hi Is there a way to remove one interface from an AE without disabling the interface? I was thinking about removing the 802.3ad aeX config from the interface but I have not tried it yet. Thanks /Roger ___ juniper-nsp mailing list