Using 14.2R7.5, so far I've scaled my dual mx104 cgnat deployment to ~4,500
private ip customers with NAPT (nat overload) to a /25 of public address space
per MX104 (so /24 total)
I think in 14.2R6 there was a MS-MIC-16G reboot issue that was occurring! With
14.2R7.5 this no longer occurs :)
I'm using (2) MX104's for cgnat and they are working great
14.2R7.5
- Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
About SRRD:
- CPU usage: beware of PR1170656. Told to be fixed in 14.2R7 15.1R4 15.1F6.
- Mem usage: beware of PR1187721. Told to be fixed only in future or service
releases (14.2R8 15.1R5 15.1F6-S2 16.1R3).
> On 25 oct. 2016 at 14:23, Mark Tinka wrote :
> On 25/Oct/16 14:16, sth...@nethelp.no w
When using version 14.1 we had some trouble to run ipfix in sampling 1000:1 ...
I have a decrease on interface traffic, when disable it the traffic come up
again
We change this router, but i have to put on-line again and update to 14.2
Using other mx-104 under j-tac recommended version(
On 25/Oct/16 14:16, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> We see significantly higher rpd CPU usage for a while after IPfix flow
> export is enabled. However, it seems to settle down to normal levels.
Yes, that's normally SRRD (Sampling Route-Record Daemon) starting up and
making sure all is well for the
> > Well, IPfix flow export certainly won't make the RE any *faster* :-)
> > That said, we are actually exporting IPfix info from a few of our
> > MX104s, and it seems to work as expected.
>
> The MX does the export inline, so the RE is not impacted, which is nice.
We see significantly higher rpd
On 25/Oct/16 12:26, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>
> Well, IPfix flow export certainly won't make the RE any *faster* :-)
> That said, we are actually exporting IPfix info from a few of our
> MX104s, and it seems to work as expected.
The MX does the export inline, so the RE is not impacted, which i
On 25/Oct/16 12:20, Rodrigo 1telecom wrote:
> Mark, if i want to use flow by ipfix too?!
Works fine for us. Inline flow sampling...
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Thanks for all the feedback!
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:17 AM
>To: Peter Sikora ; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104
>
>
>The MX104 is slo
> Mark, if i want to use flow by ipfix too?!
Well, IPfix flow export certainly won't make the RE any *faster* :-)
That said, we are actually exporting IPfix info from a few of our
MX104s, and it seems to work as expected.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
___
Mark, if i want to use flow by ipfix too?!
Enviado via iPhone
Grupo Connectoway
> Em 25 de out de 2016, às 06:16, Mark Tinka escreveu:
>
>
>
>> On 25/Oct/16 10:59, Peter Sikora wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> currently we have two MX104 running with JUNOS 13.3R8.7 and we want to
>> update them so
On 25/Oct/16 10:59, Peter Sikora wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently we have two MX104 running with JUNOS 13.3R8.7 and we want to update
> them soon.
> If possible I want to install a newer release than 13.3.
> Does somebody of you have experiences with 15.1 or 14.2 and that device types?
The MX104 is
Hi,
currently we have two MX104 running with JUNOS 13.3R8.7 and we want to update
them soon.
If possible I want to install a newer release than 13.3.
Does somebody of you have experiences with 15.1 or 14.2 and that device types?
Thanks for your help!
Best regards,
Peter
Peter Sikora
Specialis
13 matches
Mail list logo
