Re: [j-nsp] Unknown Attribute 28 in BGP

2023-06-12 Thread Einar Bjarni Halldórsson via juniper-nsp
On 6/12/23 06:37, Saku Ytti wrote: Either will help, configure either or both and you're good. Actual fixed release will behave the same as if drop-path-attribute 28 had been configured. That is read T, read L, seek past V, without parsing. Thanks Saku. I just discovered that "protocols bgp

Re: [j-nsp] Unknown Attribute 28 in BGP

2023-06-12 Thread Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp
Either will help, configure either or both and you're good. Actual fixed release will behave the same as if drop-path-attribute 28 had been configured. That is read T, read L, seek past V, without parsing. On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 at 19:36, Einar Bjarni Halldórsson wrote: > > On 6/11/23 15:24, Saku

Re: [j-nsp] Unknown Attribute 28 in BGP

2023-06-11 Thread Einar Bjarni Halldórsson via juniper-nsp
On 6/11/23 15:24, Saku Ytti wrote: set protocols bgp drop-path-attributes 28 works if your release is too old for set protocols bgp bgp-error-tolerance, and is preferable in some ways, as it will protect your downstream as well. 18.2R3-S3.11 supports protocols bgp bgp-error-tolerance, but

Re: [j-nsp] Unknown Attribute 28 in BGP

2023-06-11 Thread Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp
set protocols bgp drop-path-attributes 28 works if your release is too old for set protocols bgp bgp-error-tolerance, and is preferable in some ways, as it will protect your downstream as well. On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 at 17:25, Einar Bjarni Halldórsson via juniper-nsp wrote: > > Hi, > > We have two

[j-nsp] Unknown Attribute 28 in BGP

2023-06-11 Thread Einar Bjarni Halldórsson via juniper-nsp
Hi, We have two MX204 edge routers, each with a connection to a different upstream provider (and some IXP peerings on both). Last week the IPv6 transit session on one of them starting flapping. It turns out that we got hit with