That's my thought too. However even the 12.3 VPLS configuration guide states
FEC128 multihoming. But again showing with BGP
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:30:08 +0300
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] VPLS Multihoming on Junos - FEC confusion
From: kr...@smartcom.bg
: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] VPLS Multihoming on Junos - FEC confusion
That's my thought too. However even the 12.3 VPLS configuration guide states
FEC128 multihoming. But again showing with BGP
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:30:08
I understand that part, but it doesn't answer the original question.
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
From: per.gran...@gcc.com.cy
To: darre...@outlook.com; kr...@smartcom.bg
CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] VPLS Multihoming on Junos - FEC confusion
Date
, but it doesn't answer the original question.
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
From: per.gran...@gcc.com.cy
To: darre...@outlook.com; kr...@smartcom.bg
CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] VPLS Multihoming on Junos - FEC confusion
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:20:17
Hello,
IMHO there is mess with docs/terms. FEC 128 multihoming as described has
nothing to do with ldp. It's bgp signaling and autodiscovery.
Krasi
On 8 September 2013 22:37, Darren O'Connor darre...@outlook.com wrote:
Hi list.
I'm going over the VPLS multihoming options on Juniper's
Hi list.
I'm going over the VPLS multihoming options on Juniper's web site. I'm not
concerned with LAG and MC-LAG for the moment.
As far as I'm aware, FEC128 is when you are using manual discovery of
pseudowires (LDP) - FEC129 is when you are using BGP auto-discovery.
Juniper techpub for
6 matches
Mail list logo
