Re: [j-nsp] Weird behaviour in network after customer created a bridge inside a Windows VM

I'm not aware of any inherent loop protection when running a VC setup that substitutes for STP. Thanks, Morgan On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Jeff Meyers wrote: > Hi everybody, > > recently we saw a strange bahviour in our network. A customer with a > Proxmox server had a Windows 2k8 VM with

Re: [j-nsp] Weird behaviour in network after customer created a bridge inside a Windows VM

I'm not aware of any inherent loop protection when running a VC setup that substitutes for STP. This is not the case. VC is being used as well as RSTP. VC for the 3 virtual-chassis configuration (seperate from each other, one VC with 2x EX4550 and 2x VC with 2x EX4200) and RSTP for the typical

[j-nsp] Weird behaviour in network after customer created a bridge inside a Windows VM

Hi everybody, recently we saw a strange bahviour in our network. A customer with a Proxmox server had a Windows 2k8 VM with 2 virtual NICs (both bridged to eth0 of the server which faces the internet) and bridged them together INSIDE the VM. This caused immediately high latency and partial pa