Re: [j-nsp] Which BOGON filter strategy you would recommend IPv4 and IPv6

To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] Which BOGON filter strategy you would recommend IPv4 and IPv6 Hi ! My customer is a bigger company with customers around the world, which recently connected directly to 4 upstream providers and 1 IX via MX router and BGP Now by searching

Re: [j-nsp] Which BOGON filter strategy you would recommend IPv4 and IPv6

Hi, I would follow RFC 6890 when creating my bogon list. I would be a bit nervous about taking a BGP feed of bogons from a 3rd party in case they were compromised, and valid address space was introduced into, or invalid address space was removed from their feed. Regards, Dave On 16 February

Re: [j-nsp] Which BOGON filter strategy you would recommend IPv4 and IPv6

On 16 February 2016 at 09:49, Alexander Marhold wrote: Hey, > What do you recommend, and which way to get the lists and how often is an > update needed I recommend bogonising only statically bogons, which never change. No unallocated bogonising (calling those bogons

Re: [j-nsp] Which BOGON filter strategy you would recommend IPv4 and IPv6

Help. I use in my network feed from team cymru. Rasy way to get bogom prefixes. It is free so don't requier 100% uptime. ;-) Moste of the time BGP session is establish. W dniu wtorek, 16 lutego 2016 Alexander Marhold napisał(a): > Hi ! > > > > My customer is a bigger

[j-nsp] Which BOGON filter strategy you would recommend IPv4 and IPv6

Hi ! My customer is a bigger company with customers around the world, which recently connected directly to 4 upstream providers and 1 IX via MX router and BGP Now by searching the internet and googling I do not know which method to use to have up-to date BOGON filtering for IPv4 AND IPV6