Re: [j-nsp] convert config from m120 to mx480

2015-10-03 Thread Mark Tinka
On 2/Oct/15 22:13, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > > > We replaced a pair of M120s at our border with MX480s a little over a > year ago. Large chunks of the config will port over cleanly, but > there are some gotchas: > > 1. slot/card/interface naming and numbering might be different, depending

Re: [j-nsp] convert config from m120 to mx480

2015-10-02 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:08:34PM -0500, David B Funk wrote: > We have a venerable m120 that's being used as an edge router in our > department on campus. We've recently acquired an mx480 as a replacement. > > I'm trying to decide the best way to port the m120 config to the mx480; > Either a

[j-nsp] convert config from m120 to mx480

2015-10-02 Thread David B Funk
We have a venerable m120 that's being used as an edge router in our department on campus. We've recently acquired an mx480 as a replacement. I'm trying to decide the best way to port the m120 config to the mx480; Either a pretty much straight up port (strictly a L3 device) or try to convert it

Re: [j-nsp] convert config from m120 to mx480

2015-10-02 Thread Michael Still
Agree completely. Layer-2 should be kept as close to the access edge as possible and not span anything that could be done via Layer-3. On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:08:34PM -0500, David B Funk wrote: > > We have a venerable

Re: [j-nsp] convert config from m120 to mx480

2015-10-02 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, David B Funk wrote: We have a venerable m120 that's being used as an edge router in our department on campus. We've recently acquired an mx480 as a replacement. I'm trying to decide the best way to port the m120 config to the mx480; Either a pretty much straight up port