Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

2015-02-20 Thread Tim Durack
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Alright so would you mind sharing the business drivers that would make > you migrate your current production infrastructure to this new unproven > possibly buggy LDPv6 and 4PE/4VPE setup please? > > > > adam > Businesses bigger than me th

Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

2015-02-20 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
: Saku Ytti; na...@nanog.org; Juniper-Nsp; cisco-...@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Adam Vitkovsky mailto:adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk>> wrote: > Of Tim Durack > Sent: 20 February 2015 14:00 > IPv6 control plane this de

Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

2015-02-20 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2015-02-20 09:00 -0500), Tim Durack wrote: Hey Tim, > I also need some flavor of L2VPN (eVPN) and L3VPN (VPNv4/VPNv6) working > over IPv6. L3VPN uses BGP exclusively for VPN label signalling, no need for LDP. For L2VPN only Martini uses LDP, but if you have choice, why wouldn't you choose K

Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

2015-02-20 Thread Tim Durack
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > > Of Tim Durack > > Sent: 20 February 2015 14:00 > > IPv6 control plane this decade may yet be optimistic. > > > > And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just a whim of network > operators. > > adam > > > --

Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

2015-02-20 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
> Of Tim Durack > Sent: 20 February 2015 14:00 > IPv6 control plane this decade may yet be optimistic. > And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just a whim of network operators. adam --- This email

Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

2015-02-20 Thread Tim Durack
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On (2015-02-19 11:06 -0500), Tim Durack wrote: > > > What is the chance of getting working code this decade? I would quite > like > > to play with this new fangled IPv6 widget... > > > > (Okay, I'd like to stop using IPv4 for infrastructure. LDP

Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

2015-02-20 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2015-02-19 11:06 -0500), Tim Durack wrote: > What is the chance of getting working code this decade? I would quite like > to play with this new fangled IPv6 widget... > > (Okay, I'd like to stop using IPv4 for infrastructure. LDP is the last > piece for me.) Is there 4PE implementation to dr

[j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

2015-02-19 Thread Tim Durack
I notice draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 was posted February 11, 2015. What is the chance of getting working code this decade? I would quite like to play with this new fangled IPv6 widget... (Okay, I'd like to stop using IPv4 for infrastructure. LDP is the last piece for me.) -- Tim:> _