Re: [j-nsp] hold-queue on EX4300 ?

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:31, james list wrote: Hey, > we're thinking to upgrade to 10 Gbs the interface, this should help. It might, or it might make it worse. The absolute speed doesn't matter, the relative speed of combined ingresses to egress matter. If you have 10G ingress and 1G egress,

Re: [j-nsp] hold-queue on EX4300 ?

Hi Ytti we're thinking to upgrade to 10 Gbs the interface, this should help. Cheers James Il giorno dom 13 dic 2020 alle ore 12:45 Saku Ytti ha scritto: > Hey James, > > > I see on a customer EX4300 in VC connected to Cisco 3560 huge drop > errors. > > This isn't specific enough to understand w

Re: [j-nsp] hold-queue on EX4300 ?

Hey James, > I see on a customer EX4300 in VC connected to Cisco 3560 huge drop errors. This isn't specific enough to understand what is going on. > On Cisco side I've mitigated with hold-queue 4096 but on EX4300 is there > any related command ? Hold-queue is for punted packets, not particularl

[j-nsp] hold-queue on EX4300 ?

Dear experts I see on a customer EX4300 in VC connected to Cisco 3560 huge drop errors. On Cisco side I've mitigated with hold-queue 4096 but on EX4300 is there any related command ? Or do I'm forced to change buffer size ? Thanks in advance for your help Cheers James ___