First remove authentication and try again
Naminda
Sent by dialog blackberry
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Fri May 04 21:30:08 2007
Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 54, Issue 6
Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: BGP over GRE (Guy Davies)
2. Re: BGP over GRE (Scott Morris)
3. Re: BGP over GRE (Scott Morris)
4. Re: BGP over GRE (Guy Davies)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:53:45 +0100
From: "Guy Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP over GRE
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Scott,
This error message means that the far end is sending packets with the
source of 10.255.255.2 and the AS number 7963. In your config, there
is no peer with that config. I suspect that you're probably using a
different address for that peer. If you have direct connectivity to
that peer on that address, then simply update your config to use the
correct neighbour address and it should work.
Rgds,
Guy
On 04/05/07, Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a very strange question, and very strange scenario... but I'm also
> getting some very strange errors, so I'm hoping that someone here may have
> seen this before and can give me some hint of whatever I'm apparantly not
> thinking of!
>
> I have a GRE tunnel from a J2300 to a Cisco router. The GRE is very simple,
> and it works just fine (at least as far as pinging the other end of the
> tunnel or telnetting to it goes!). However, BGP over this tunnel does not
> work. Again, it SHOULD be a very simple setup, directly connected ebgp
> peers, no multihop, nothing strange.
>
> It's not working. On the Cisco side, it shows as an authentication error
> (at first we weren't doing any, but then turned it on just to see if it made
> a difference which it did not). But on the Juniper side, the error shows up
> ONLY in the /var/log/messages file.
>
> May 4 00:31:01 Emanon-Edge rpd[2797]: bgp_pp_recv: NOTIFICATION sent to
> 10.255.255.2+34211 (proto): code 2 (Open Message Error) subcode 5
> (authentication failure), Reason: no group for 10.255.255.2+34211 (proto)
> from AS 7963 found (peer idled), dropping him
>
> This was the same message with or without authentication enabled on the BGP
> portion. When I do a "monitor interface" to try to watch the traffic, I
> don't even SEE any outbound bgp traffic. Same thing with traceoptions
> detail. This "no group" message is quite vexing.
>
> Anyone seen anything like this before? I'm hoping it's something simple and
> driven by lack of sleep, but nothing is leaping at me.
>
> TIA,
>
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:57:46 -0400
From: "Scott Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP over GRE
To: "'Kristian Larsson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
gr-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
clear-dont-fragment-bit;
tunnel {
source xxx.xxx.115.178;
destination yyy.yyy.112.2;
no-path-mtu-discovery;
}
family inet {
mtu 1500;
address 10.255.255.1/30;
}
}
}
Protocols {
bgp {
group STDIO {
type external;
traceoptions {
file STDIO;
flag packets send receive detail;
}
local-address 10.255.255.1;
import No-Routes-In;
authentication-key "$9$Opu01IcreWLxdhSs4aZq.5QF/A0IEy"; ##
SECRET-DATA
export BadMyLinks;
peer-as 7963;
neighbor 10.255.255.2;
}
}
Yes, my autonomous-system is defined... My other eBGP peers work perfectly
fine (one directly connected, two multihop) without issue.
I'd love to give more log details, but there aren't any! :)
Notice the traceoptions in the config there. Here is the ENTIRE file (yes,
the date/time on the router is accurate):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> show log STDIO
Apr 13 15:48:53 trace_on: Tracing to "/var/log/STDIO" started
Apr 13 20:42:27.099946 bgp_peer_mgmt_clear: NOTIFICATION sent to
10.255.255.2 (External AS 7963): code 6 (Cease) subcode 4 (Administratively
Reset), Reason: Management session cleared BGP neighbor
Apr 13 20:42:27.101386 bgp_send: sending 21 bytes to 10.255.255.2 (External
AS 7963)
Apr 13 20:42:27.101410
Apr 13 20:42:27.101410 BGP SEND (null) -> 10.255.255.2
Apr 13 20:42:27.103228 BGP SEND message type 3 (Notification) length 21
Apr 13 20:42:27.103288 BGP SEND Notification code 6 (Cease) subcode 4
(Administratively Reset)
Apr 13 20:42:27.103566 bgp_send: sending 21 bytes to 10.255.255.2 (External
AS 7963) failed: Bad file descriptor
Apr 18 23:12:37.048543 bgp_peer_mgmt_clear: NOTIFICATION sent to
10.255.255.2 (External AS 7963): code 6 (Cease) subcode 4 (Administratively
Reset), Reason: Management session cleared BGP neighbor
Apr 18 23:12:37.048719 bgp_send: sending 21 bytes to 10.255.255.2 (External
AS 7963)
Apr 18 23:12:37.048742
Apr 18 23:12:37.048742 BGP SEND (null) -> 10.255.255.2
Apr 18 23:12:37.048788 BGP SEND message type 3 (Notification) length 21
Apr 18 23:12:37.048807 BGP SEND Notification code 6 (Cease) subcode 4
(Administratively Reset)
Apr 18 23:12:37.049050 bgp_send: sending 21 bytes to 10.255.255.2 (External
AS 7963) failed: Bad file descriptor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So something freaky is going on, just not sure what it is!
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Kristian Larsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 2:18 AM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP over GRE
Could we please have som configuration excerpts?
Right now the only similar scenario I can come up with was when I was doing
iBGP over GRE, but then I made the mistake of terminating both the GRE and
the iBGP session on the other routers loopback and so it failed. Since this
is an eBGP session it's even less complicated. But please, provide some
configurations and some more log messages wouldn't hurt.
Kristian.
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:34:37AM -0400, Scott Morris wrote:
> This is a very strange question, and very strange scenario... but I'm
> also getting some very strange errors, so I'm hoping that someone here
> may have seen this before and can give me some hint of whatever I'm
> apparantly not thinking of!
>
> I have a GRE tunnel from a J2300 to a Cisco router. The GRE is very
> simple, and it works just fine (at least as far as pinging the other
> end of the tunnel or telnetting to it goes!). However, BGP over this
> tunnel does not work. Again, it SHOULD be a very simple setup,
> directly connected ebgp peers, no multihop, nothing strange.
>
> It's not working. On the Cisco side, it shows as an authentication
> error (at first we weren't doing any, but then turned it on just to
> see if it made a difference which it did not). But on the Juniper
> side, the error shows up ONLY in the /var/log/messages file.
>
> May 4 00:31:01 Emanon-Edge rpd[2797]: bgp_pp_recv: NOTIFICATION sent
> to
> 10.255.255.2+34211 (proto): code 2 (Open Message Error) subcode 5
> (authentication failure), Reason: no group for 10.255.255.2+34211
> (proto) from AS 7963 found (peer idled), dropping him
>
> This was the same message with or without authentication enabled on
> the BGP portion. When I do a "monitor interface" to try to watch the
> traffic, I don't even SEE any outbound bgp traffic. Same thing with
> traceoptions detail. This "no group" message is quite vexing.
>
> Anyone seen anything like this before? I'm hoping it's something
> simple and driven by lack of sleep, but nothing is leaping at me.
>
> TIA,
>
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Kristian Larsson KLL-RIPE
Network Engineer SpriteLink [AS39525]
+46 704 910401 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:59:40 -0400
From: "Scott Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP over GRE
To: "'Guy Davies'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In theory, I'd agree with you, but that's not the case (I'd have to smack
myself for overlooking that one!):
group STDIO {
type external;
traceoptions {
file STDIO;
flag packets send receive detail;
}
local-address 10.255.255.1;
import No-Routes-In;
authentication-key "$9$Opu01IcreWLxdhSs4aZq.5QF/A0IEy"; ##
SECRET-DATA
export BadMyLinks;
peer-as 7963;
neighbor 10.255.255.2;
}
Neighbor is there plain as day.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP over GRE
Hi Scott,
This error message means that the far end is sending packets with the source
of 10.255.255.2 and the AS number 7963. In your config, there is no peer
with that config. I suspect that you're probably using a different address
for that peer. If you have direct connectivity to that peer on that
address, then simply update your config to use the correct neighbour address
and it should work.
Rgds,
Guy
On 04/05/07, Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a very strange question, and very strange scenario... but I'm
> also getting some very strange errors, so I'm hoping that someone here
> may have seen this before and can give me some hint of whatever I'm
> apparantly not thinking of!
>
> I have a GRE tunnel from a J2300 to a Cisco router. The GRE is very
> simple, and it works just fine (at least as far as pinging the other
> end of the tunnel or telnetting to it goes!). However, BGP over this
> tunnel does not work. Again, it SHOULD be a very simple setup,
> directly connected ebgp peers, no multihop, nothing strange.
>
> It's not working. On the Cisco side, it shows as an authentication
> error (at first we weren't doing any, but then turned it on just to
> see if it made a difference which it did not). But on the Juniper
> side, the error shows up ONLY in the /var/log/messages file.
>
> May 4 00:31:01 Emanon-Edge rpd[2797]: bgp_pp_recv: NOTIFICATION sent
> to
> 10.255.255.2+34211 (proto): code 2 (Open Message Error) subcode 5
> (authentication failure), Reason: no group for 10.255.255.2+34211
> (proto) from AS 7963 found (peer idled), dropping him
>
> This was the same message with or without authentication enabled on
> the BGP portion. When I do a "monitor interface" to try to watch the
> traffic, I don't even SEE any outbound bgp traffic. Same thing with
> traceoptions detail. This "no group" message is quite vexing.
>
> Anyone seen anything like this before? I'm hoping it's something
> simple and driven by lack of sleep, but nothing is leaping at me.
>
> TIA,
>
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 14:10:06 +0100
From: "Guy Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP over GRE
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Scott
On 04/05/07, Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Notice the traceoptions in the config there. Here is the ENTIRE file (yes,
> the date/time on the router is accurate):
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show log STDIO
> Apr 13 15:48:53 trace_on: Tracing to "/var/log/STDIO" started
> Apr 13 20:42:27.099946 bgp_peer_mgmt_clear: NOTIFICATION sent to
> 10.255.255.2 (External AS 7963): code 6 (Cease) subcode 4 (Administratively
> Reset), Reason: Management session cleared BGP neighbor
> Apr 13 20:42:27.101386 bgp_send: sending 21 bytes to 10.255.255.2 (External
> AS 7963)
> Apr 13 20:42:27.101410
> Apr 13 20:42:27.101410 BGP SEND (null) -> 10.255.255.2
> Apr 13 20:42:27.103228 BGP SEND message type 3 (Notification) length 21
> Apr 13 20:42:27.103288 BGP SEND Notification code 6 (Cease) subcode 4
> (Administratively Reset)
> Apr 13 20:42:27.103566 bgp_send: sending 21 bytes to 10.255.255.2 (External
> AS 7963) failed: Bad file descriptor
> Apr 18 23:12:37.048543 bgp_peer_mgmt_clear: NOTIFICATION sent to
> 10.255.255.2 (External AS 7963): code 6 (Cease) subcode 4 (Administratively
> Reset), Reason: Management session cleared BGP neighbor
> Apr 18 23:12:37.048719 bgp_send: sending 21 bytes to 10.255.255.2 (External
> AS 7963)
> Apr 18 23:12:37.048742
> Apr 18 23:12:37.048742 BGP SEND (null) -> 10.255.255.2
> Apr 18 23:12:37.048788 BGP SEND message type 3 (Notification) length 21
> Apr 18 23:12:37.048807 BGP SEND Notification code 6 (Cease) subcode 4
> (Administratively Reset)
> Apr 18 23:12:37.049050 bgp_send: sending 21 bytes to 10.255.255.2 (External
> AS 7963) failed: Bad file descriptor
Ah, this is a new error. It's saying that the *far end* is closing
the session. You'll need to look at the logs on the far end to see
what the problem might be :-)
Rgds,
Guy
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 54, Issue 6
******************************************
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
