Hi Rafael,
Thanks for your help.
I have tried using explicit-null as it's a point-to-point (PE-to-PE) and as
there is no need for PHP, and it has worked as expected (the l2circuits
came up) but afterwards I have replaced the whole router to a better one
and the tunnels came up even without explici
Caio,
Have you check something?
Are these extremes let the signaling pass thru?
att
Alexandre
Em 21 de out de 2017, à(s) 07:54, Rafael Ganascim
mailto:rganas...@gmail.com>> escreveu:
Just more checks:
How is the MPLS forwarding table for the negotiated Labels for loopback and
l2circuit?
Are
Just more checks:
How is the MPLS forwarding table for the negotiated Labels for loopback and
l2circuit?
Are you using label PHP? Can you switch It off?
Is the LDP adjacency up and exchanging labels?
Are the l2circuit neighbors configured between loopback interfaces?
Regards,
Em 20 de out de
*> Also, after your physical change, was ospf/isis up on both sides?*
No OSPF/ISIS just static routes pointing to their loopbacks.
Cheers,
Caio
Em 20 de out de 2017 11:48 AM, "Daniel Rohan" escreveu:
Also, after your physical change, was ospf/isis up on both sides?
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6
On 20 October 2017 at 19:39, wrote:
Hey,
>> I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after
>> 5m and used OSPF for that segment of our Pre-Prod Lab.
>
> There's nothing magic about IS-IS. We've had IS-IS running through
> Extreme switches many times (still have one such
No TE, no problem. Extreme knows how to do it reeeally wrong :) At least,
last time I checked.
But yes, at the basic level it works. Adjacency, LSAs etc.
20 окт. 2017 г. 6:39 ПП пользователь написал:
> I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after
> 5m and used OSPF fo
> I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after
> 5m and used OSPF for that segment of our Pre-Prod Lab.
There's nothing magic about IS-IS. We've had IS-IS running through
Extreme switches many times (still have one such adjacency in our lab,
running through one X460 and
Alphabet soup mistake =D. I never had a need for LDP alone.
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443
On 10/20/17 11:1
Why would you need rsvp for ldp ? I don't think they have dependency on each
other... As I understand it, you can use RSVP for label advertisement, OR, you
can use LDP for label advertisement. They are alternatives to each other.
-Aaron
___
juniper
Well,
IS-IS or OSPF?
Q: And don't you need at least RSVP for the LDP signaling? But
since he didn't change nothing beside the L2 switches... Not relevant
(maybe).
I had a hard time passing IS-IS thru Extreme Switch, give up after
5m and used OSPF for that segment of our Pre
> *Did you change any of the physical interfaces as part of your topology
change? And if so, is family mpls configured on that new port? Is that new
port configured under protocols ldp and protocols mpls along with the
loopback used for signaling? *
No. Both of the MX routers are using the same in
Same MTU 9216.
LDP neighborhood ok
Same loopback filters, the only change was the L2 path.
Cheers,
Caio
Em 20 de out de 2017 9:57 AM, "Alexandre Guimaraes" <
alexandre.guimar...@ascenty.com> escreveu:
MTU?
RSVP ISIS/OSPF LDP neighborhood are ok?
Loopback filters?
att
Alexandre
Em 20 de out d
Also, after your physical change, was ospf/isis up on both sides?
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:12 AM Daniel Rohan wrote:
> Did you change any of the physical interfaces as part of your topology
> change? And if so, is family mpls configured on that new port? Is that new
> port configured under pro
Did you change any of the physical interfaces as part of your topology
change? And if so, is family mpls configured on that new port? Is that new
port configured under protocols ldp and protocols mpls along with the
loopback used for signaling?
Do your control plane filters still permit ldp on bot
MTU?
RSVP ISIS/OSPF LDP neighborhood are ok?
Loopback filters?
att
Alexandre
Em 20 de out de 2017, à(s) 08:26, Caio
mailto:cai...@gmail.com>> escreveu:
Hello people,
There's a weird problem I would like to share with you.
I have the following scenario:
MX104 -> L2 SW (1) -> L2 SW (2) -> MX8
Hello people,
There's a weird problem I would like to share with you.
I have the following scenario:
MX104 -> L2 SW (1) -> L2 SW (2) -> MX80
Both L2 SW are Extreme X460 and they're doing nothing except forwarding
frames at layer 2.
In order to simplify our topology, we have changed the MX104 up
16 matches
Mail list logo
