Hi
I think the pdf is still a good design but as the rest of the guys said is
only available on MX platforms.
Today DCI (Datacenter Interconnection) is a big challenge, applications
such as vmotion requires the same subnet be extended trough many sites. VPLS
is one of the options as well MPLS L2
Thanks for all replies!
Interesting document, is the design described in the document still a good
design today and a few year ahead? :)
Regards
Johan
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Cristiano Monteiro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe this link helps you
>
> http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implem
The EX doesn't support vpls either. The implementation described in the pdf
also uses an MX for the mpls vpn portion.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Cristiano Monteiro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe this link helps you
>
> http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implementation-guides/8010050-en.pdf
>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 6:31 AM
Subject: [j-nsp] mpls question
Hi,
I have a question regarding MPLS on ex-series. I have a situation where i
need to connect several data centers
together. I have never worked with MPLS before but my idea is to use
MPLS to transport VLANs between the data c
The EX doesn't support L3VPN/VRF. You'd have to use an MX80 at the least.
You could do pseudowires per customer though.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Johan Borch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding MPLS on ex-series. I have a situation where i
> need to connect several data centers
Hi,
Maybe this link helps you
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implementation-guides/8010050-en.pdf
Best Regards,
Cristiano Monteiro
2011/5/12 Johan Borch
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding MPLS on ex-series. I have a situation where i
> need to connect several data centers
> toge
Hi,
I have a question regarding MPLS on ex-series. I have a situation where i
need to connect several data centers
together. I have never worked with MPLS before but my idea is to use
MPLS to transport VLANs between the data centers. An example: a customer is
located in it's own VRF and we
use VLA
.
This means few milliseconds of recovery time rather than hundreds of ms (and
no ping typically lost)
Br,
Filippo
- Original Message -
From: "Cord MacLeod"
To: "William Jackson"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MPLS Question
Fr
See in line tobelow
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:00 PM, William Jackson wrote:
> On my ingress router I am setting up some RSVP label paths with strict
> ERO's, I add the fast reroute option and the adaptive option. So that
> the primary and secondary paths are already up.
Adaptive is to make the
From my own tests with this, Junipers will swap the path in the same
second. But yes, generally a single ping will be lost.
On Apr 27, 2009, at 8:00 AM, William Jackson wrote:
Hi
Just dipping my feet into the world of MPLS and have some quick
questions.
On my ingress router I am set
Hi
Just dipping my feet into the world of MPLS and have some quick
questions.
On my ingress router I am setting up some RSVP label paths with strict
ERO's, I add the fast reroute option and the adaptive option. So that
the primary and secondary paths are already up.
On my transit nodes
11 matches
Mail list logo
