I agree with you that this seems like a simple task but in true
Juniper fashion, there's a hundred ways to do it depending on your
needs! :D
NOTE: I've never actually worked with these kinds of policers before
so obviously test any suggestions first.
I think the physical interface policer
That makes sense Bit and thanks for the clarification. Hey, so at least I
was partially correct! Let me run this by my Juniper peers that do not
participate here.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Bit Gossip wrote:
> Hi Mac,
> what you mention will do the job which is to police ALL traffic ingres
Hi Mac,
what you mention will do the job which is to police ALL traffic ingress
into a physical interface which is:
- ALL address-families of ALL logical units.
This means that I have to create a firewall filter per address-family
because the documentation says: 'You cannot specify family any. You
Let me position my thoughts as well, I have been out of JUNOS for some time
but I did get pretty far in my knowledge there along the way. Also, this is
from the Juniper site for configuring policers on a physical interface:
Applying Firewall Filters That Reference Physical Interface Policers
Afte
Help me with my JUNOS commands structure and interfaces but unit 0 is the
physical interface correct? I mean, you always have to configure unit 0 so
to me that is just part of the interface configuration.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Bit Gossip wrote:
> This is Mx480 Junos10.2R2.11 and DPC.
This is Mx480 Junos10.2R2.11 and DPC.
Any idea why I can not apply a physical-interface-policer to a
physical-interface?
While it can be applied to 'unit 0' of the same interface.
Thanks,
bit.
[edit interfaces xe-4/1/0]
l...@rc2# run show configuration firewall policer L-ECN
physical-interface-p
6 matches
Mail list logo
