Re: [j-nsp] setting named communities on static routes

2016-01-28 Thread Jeff Haas
> On Jan 28, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Does anyone know why Junos doesn't accept named communities for static > routes? This doesn't work: > > set routing-options static route 192.0.2.0/24 community TEST > set policy-options community TEST members 65000:100 >

[j-nsp] setting named communities on static routes

2016-01-28 Thread Chuck Anderson
Does anyone know why Junos doesn't accept named communities for static routes? This doesn't work: set routing-options static route 192.0.2.0/24 community TEST set policy-options community TEST members 65000:100 Instead we are forced to put the value directly: set routing-options static route

Re: [j-nsp] setting named communities on static routes

2016-01-28 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:30:52PM -0500, Jeff Haas wrote: > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > > Does anyone know why Junos doesn't accept named communities for static > > routes? This doesn't work: > > > > set routing-options static route 192.0.2.0/24

Re: [j-nsp] setting named communities on static routes

2016-01-28 Thread Luis Balbinot
+1M Or a policy rule if it makes sense. Like IOS that allows you to apply a route-map to every network statement under the BGP configuration. On Jan 28, 2016 18:56, "Chuck Anderson" wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:30:52PM -0500, Jeff Haas wrote: > > > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at