On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:16:56AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> That's right, which is what we see for the export policies
> we applied to our IS-IS deployment. I guess the issue we're
> seeing with wrong behaviour for the v4 BGP export policy
> kind of threw us off with what to expect for v6.
>
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 03:47 -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On the subject of impossible dreams that would make troubleshooting
> these kinds of things easier, it would be really handy if "test policy"
> supported policy chains and logical-routers. Actually it would be nice
The ability to do
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 04:47:49 pm Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
> Are you talking about an explicit "then accept" final
> term, or an implicit default-action accept?
Explicit. Still debugging...
> Once upon a
> time I saw a nice table of the protocol-specific
> default-action defaults, but
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 11:09:18 am Stacy W. Smith wrote:
> There's a difference between a final term of:
>
> term foo {
> then accept;
> }
>
> and the protocol-specific implicit default policy. In the
> case of BGP, the default policy is equivalent to:
>
> policy foo {
> term bar {
>
On Apr 14, 2009, at 8:53 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 10:19:24 am Stacy W. Smith wrote:
Are you certain you don't see this same behavior for an
IPv4 BGP export policy?
Yes, perhaps that's the bug :-). I'll take a closer look at
it and figure out what's going on. We only h
Are you certain you don't see this same behavior for an IPv4 BGP
export policy? I believe what you describe is the expected behavior
and is consistent across all (or at least most) applications of
routing policy on JUNOS.
--Stacy
On Apr 14, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
Hi all.
W
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 10:19:24 am Stacy W. Smith wrote:
> Are you certain you don't see this same behavior for an
> IPv4 BGP export policy?
Yes, perhaps that's the bug :-). I'll take a closer look at
it and figure out what's going on. We only have one or two
of these policies. It's more th
Hi all.
We recently experienced a situation where an M7i (JunOS
9.4R1.8), on which we applied an export policy for a v6 BGP
session, was leaking more v6 routes than it should have
been.
We realized that if the final term in the BGP policy was
'accept', not only did the router export the BGP v
8 matches
Mail list logo
