Yes, no tp hardware in the chassis, this is why I'm using no-tunnel
-services cmd.
Is there any workaround? Or at least the documentation mentioning that VPLS
PE is not supported on certain FPCs...
Documented for instance at
A-ha. Thanks.
I needed an additional router in my setup, so I was using this older M20.
Obviously this won't work. If I segment my M320 into two logical routers,
then one of those two logical routers on M320 would replace the M20 and I
should be able to proceed with this VPLS setup, correct?
On
One thing to add, if you don't have the tunnel-pic, you need to
configure some sort of VE interface, in addition to use
no-tunnel-services statement.
-Simon
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Marlon Duksa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A-ha. Thanks.
I needed an additional router in my setup, so I was
Thanks. Can you provide little more info on this, or at least doc reference.
I've never heard of this.
Thanks,
Marlon
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Simon Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing to add, if you don't have the tunnel-pic, you need to
configure some sort of VE interface, in
Does anyone know why M20 would not learn remote (comming from a PE) MAC
addresses? I'm on Junos 9.1.
It is learning ce mac addresses. Also it is forwarding traffic in the ce-pe
direction, but everything coming from the pe side is not getting out on the
ce side.
I even put the sniffer between MX
of a show chassis hardware
HTHs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon Duksa
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:52 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] vpls remote mac learning on M20 on Junos 9.1?
Does anyone know why M20
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] vpls remote mac learning on M20 on Junos 9.1?
Does anyone know why M20 would not learn remote (comming from a PE) MAC
addresses? I'm on Junos 9.1.
It is learning ce mac addresses. Also it is forwarding traffic in the
ce-pe direction, but everything coming
7 matches
Mail list logo
