> I would strongly advise against the previous suggestion of not running
> iBGP between the routers. While the topology in particular may
> function without it, the next person to come along and work on the
> network may not expect it to be configured
Hmm... really depends. I can easily recall sc
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Huan Pham wrote:
Lets go back to Ali question, and what he wants:
I want them to send updates to each other and to the RR-Clients.
He will need to have unique RR IDs.
Pls tell me if this is not the case. Thanks.
If you take that statement very literally, then you are c
ether.net] On Behalf Of Doug Hanks
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2013 2:02 PM
> To: Ali Sumsam;
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RR cluster
>
> vanilla ibgp between the RRs would work
>
>
> On 2/5/13 6:36 PM, "Ali Sumsam" wrote:
>
> >Hi All,
> >I want to co
Hi Shane, and all
I wish to withdraw the "best practice" advice, as it is a debatable topic.
Lets go back to Ali question, and what he wants:
>>> I want them to send updates to each other and to the RR-Clients.
He will need to have unique RR IDs.
Pls tell me if this is not the case. Thanks.
On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Huan Pham wrote:
> Aggree with Doug with one condition: RRs do not share cluster ID.
>
> If the two RRs have the same Cluster ID, then one RR does not accept routes
> advertised by the other RR which it receives from its clients. It however
> DOES accept routes gene
While the aforementioned approach (unique IDs and vanilla iBGP in
between) seems a reasonable baseline, the best way in practice depends
on factors like what sort of network the the RRs serve, how much state
they need to hold, whether they are on-line (do carry transit traffic)
or off-line (are ju
Aggree with Doug with one condition: RRs do not share cluster ID.
If the two RRs have the same Cluster ID, then one RR does not accept routes
advertised by the other RR which it receives from its clients. It however DOES
accept routes generated by the other RR itself.
As a best practice, keep
Are these dedicated RR's or are they combined RR/PE devices?
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Doug Hanks
Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2013 2:02 PM
To: Ali Sumsam;
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RR cluster
va
vanilla ibgp between the RRs would work
On 2/5/13 6:36 PM, "Ali Sumsam" wrote:
>Hi All,
>I want to configure two RRs in my network.
>What should be the relation between two of them?
>I want them to send updates to each other and to the RR-Clients.
>
>Regards,
>*Ali Sumsam CCIE*
>*Network Engine
9 matches
Mail list logo
