Dalibor wrote:
> Is kaffe's behaviour a bug? That's a tricky question: I am not
> sure. According to the descriptions of class loader semantics given
> above, I believe that the buggy class loader's behaviour is outside
> the spec, for Java 1.2 semantics, and at least questionable for 1.1
> semant
Hi Nico & Dalibor,
even though I can't offer a KaffeOS release for Nico at this time,
you may want to read Section 4.2 (pages 56-63) of my dissertation
about this topic:
http://www.stanford.edu/~gback/thesis/kaffeos-phd-thesis.pdf
- Godmar
Hi Nico,
before I start, thanks for the great code examples to
play with.
The problem is, as you pointed out, that the buggy
class loader does
not delegate the loading of system classes (java.*) to
the system
class loader.
There is no way in the java language to mandate that a
subclass of
Class
--- Jukka Santala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > As far as I know the Classpath project (and gcj)
> have
> > a Java 2d implementation, you might want to look
> > there. Finally, you could still write your own :)
> > Especially if you are interested in h
CVSROOT:/cvs/kaffe
Module name:kaffe
Changes by: dalibor 02/05/20 12:23:53
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
libraries/clib/native: Field.c
libraries/javalib/java/lang/reflect: Field.java
Log message:
fixed several bugs regarding setting and g
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> As far as I know the Classpath project (and gcj) have
> a Java 2d implementation, you might want to look
> there. Finally, you could still write your own :)
> Especially if you are interested in hacking on kaffe.
Last I checked, Classpath & gcj didn't e
--- James Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the Sun Classes, which one would I add to the
> classpath that would allow me to draw 2D graphics.
>
rt.jar. But that's probably not going to be of much
help anyway. I tried it and the Java2D demo from Sun's
JDK 1.3 crashed on me (with a Null
