Re: [kaffe] Debugging Tools for the VM

2002-10-07 Thread Patrick Tullmann
> I am realativly new to this, so I'd like to ask If someone could direct me to > some resources on debugging the VM, i.e. how can I trace the program flow of > the Basic Java Classes, such as java.lang.System or java.lang.Object. In addition to FAQ.debugging, you should look at FAQ.xdebugging

[kaffe] Re: Bug Report - javac requires /usr/lib/rt.jar to be part of -classpath

2002-10-07 Thread Warwick Hunter
Oops, the path in that bug report and patch should actually be /usr/jre/lib/rt.jar Warwick -- Warwick HunterAgile TV Corporation Voice: +61 7 5584 5912Fax: +61 7 5575 9550 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.agile.tv __

Re: [kaffe] Debugging Tools for the VM

2002-10-07 Thread Warwick Hunter
Fabio, The FAQ for debugging will give you some pointers. http://www.kaffe.org/doc/kaffe/FAQ.debugging I start by using -verbose to show me the classes that are loaded and to try and get some initial idea of where things might be going wrong. I then turn off -verbose and use various settings o

[kaffe] Debugging Tools for the VM

2002-10-07 Thread Fabio Fracassi
Hi, I am working on Gilgul, a Kaffe based extension to the Java Language (http://javalab.cs.uni-bonn.de/research/gilgul/). At the moment I am porting our changes to the 1.0.7 Version of Kaffe. I've ran into problems which happen somewhere during the initialisation of an Application, which mak

Re: [kaffe] KeyEvent -> JDK 1.4 patch (And longer explanation;)

2002-10-07 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Jukka, --- Jukka Santala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Dalibor Topic wrote: > > Different application will need different > profiles. > > Encoding profile information in comments is a bad > > idea, in my opinion, as it leads to a lot of > > uninformative comments. I'd prefer

Re: [kaffe] KeyEvent -> JDK 1.4 patch (And longer explanation;)

2002-10-07 Thread Jukka Santala
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Different application will need different profiles. > Encoding profile information in comments is a bad > idea, in my opinion, as it leads to a lot of > uninformative comments. I'd prefer to see an external Hm, "Uninformative comments", what about JavaDo