[kaffe] Kaffe vs. Freenet round (N+2): nio

2003-06-16 Thread Greg Wooledge
20:12 greycat> is nio going to be mandatory in 0.5.2? this is going to screw kaffe users 20:13 toad_> greycat: yes. kaffe users can fix the bugs. $ ln -sf freenet-nio-20030616.jar freenet.jar $ java freenet.node.Main java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Failed to locate

Re: [kaffe] libraries/clib/net/InetAddressImpl.c cannot be compiled on old Linux

2003-06-16 Thread Ito Kazumitsu
In message "Re: [kaffe] libraries/clib/net/InetAddressImpl.c cannot be compiled on old Linux" on 03/06/13, Ito Kazumitsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In message "Re: [kaffe] libraries/clib/net/InetAddressImpl.c cannot be compiled on > old Linux" > on 03/06/13, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [kaffe] Replaced the good old lightweight AWT?!

2003-06-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Jim, --- Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, we have multiple AWTs now, selectable at configure time. > > I wouldn't mind seeing it so that we could compile them all in, and > easily select them at run time, using properties, or something like > that. If somebody was really ambiti

Re: Using tar files (was Re: [kaffe] make dist-gzip on OpenBSD)

2003-06-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
--- Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 15:57, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > 'make dist-gzip' on OpenBSD produces several of these: > > > > tar: File name too long for tar > kaffe-1.1.x-cvs/libraries/javalib/META-INF/services/javax.sound.sampled.spi.FormatConversionProvider > >

Using tar files (was Re: [kaffe] make dist-gzip on OpenBSD)

2003-06-16 Thread Jim Pick
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 15:57, Greg Wooledge wrote: > 'make dist-gzip' on OpenBSD produces several of these: > > tar: File name too long for tar > kaffe-1.1.x-cvs/libraries/javalib/META-INF/services/javax.sound.sampled.spi.FormatConversionProvider > tar: File name too long for tar > kaffe-1.1.x-cv

Re: [kaffe] Replaced the good old lightweight AWT?!

2003-06-16 Thread Jim Pick
Actually, we have multiple AWTs now, selectable at configure time. I wouldn't mind seeing it so that we could compile them all in, and easily select them at run time, using properties, or something like that. If somebody was really ambitious, maybe it's even possible to mix them up, and run multi

Re: [kaffe] kaffe 1.1.0 with qt awt on board like assabet

2003-06-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Sankalpa, --- Sankalpa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > First of all I must thank to the community for their prompt > responses,specially to Dalibor Topic. I'm flattered ;) > I managed to up kaffe on my board like assabet with qt awt support. cool. > Now I tested with a simp

[kaffe] kaffe 1.1.0 with qt awt on board like assabet

2003-06-16 Thread Sankalpa
Hi First of all I must thank to the community for their prompt responses,specially to Dalibor Topic. I managed to up kaffe on my board like assabet with qt awt support. I maned to get over with first instance of compilation break of below by export LDFLAGS=-lm bef

Re: [kaffe] arm linux compilation problem of kaffe-1.1.0

2003-06-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Sankalpa, --- Sankalpa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > arm-linux-gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fsigned-char -o kaffeh > sigs.o support.o main.o mem.o inflate.o jar.o utf8const.o readClass.o > constants.o debug.o -L/tmp/qtopia/qtopia/qt-2.3.4/lib -lqte -Wl,--rpath > -Wl,/usr/local/arm/2.9