Ito Kazumitsu wrote:
private static class MyResolver implements EntityResolver {
public InputSource resolveEntity (String publicId, String systemId) {
try {
return new InputSource((new URL(systemId)).openStream());
This is the bug right here ... you're creating an InputSource
wit
The basic issue is that applying _any_ heuristic at that level
is going to fail badly in some cases. Throwing an exception is
at least an indication that the inputs were bad. And AElfred2
was at least reporting a warning about what was wrong, before
throwing the exception.
In situations like t
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 08:21:35 -0700
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's part of the reason why the SAX spec has long said specifically:
"An InputSource object belongs to the application: the SAX parser
shall never modify it in any way...". (Which is what your pat
PatchSet 4114
Date: 2003/10/19 02:31:53
Author: kaz
Branch: HEAD
Tag: (none)
Log:
2003-10-19 Ito Kazumitsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* libraries/javalib/gnu/xml/aelfred2/SAXDriver.java:
Reverted because the 2003-10-18 change was unreasonable.
Members:
ChangeLog:1.1708->1.170
> "*" == Ito Kazumitsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
*> Giving the warning of "missing system ID" should be postponed
*> until the system ID is really needed.
*>
*> And here is my patch:
With this patch, and without the previvous patch, my test
case goes like this:
bash-2.05b$ java TestEntit
> ":" == David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:> Ito Kazumitsu wrote:
>> private static class MyResolver implements EntityResolver {
>> public InputSource resolveEntity (String publicId, String systemId) {
>> try {
>> return new InputSource((new URL(systemId)).openStream());
:> This is
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 08:21:35 -0700
> > David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>That's part of the reason why the SAX spec has long said specifically:
> >>"An InputSource object belongs to the application: the SA
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 08:21:35 -0700
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's part of the reason why the SAX spec has long said specifically:
> "An InputSource object belongs to the application: the SAX parser
> shall never modify it in any way...". (Which is what your patch
> makes it do
Hello!
I don't know if this peace of code is in use, but I found a missing
'break' statement in win32's setpriority code:
bye - Marc
--
#!/bin/sh
set - `type $0` 'tr "[a-zA-Z]" "[n-za-mN-ZA-M]"';while [ "$2" != "" ];do \
shift;done; echo 'frq -a -rc '`echo "$0"| $1 `'>$UBZR/.`rpub signature|'`\
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 08:59:20 +0900
Ito Kazumitsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found a case where GNU JAXP throws unwanted SAXParseExceptions.
> The test case is attached below. When using Sun's JAXP or
> Xerces, such exceptions are not thrown.
>
> Also attached is my suggested patch, which I
10 matches
Mail list logo
