Kirankumar T wrote:
hi
Hi Kirankumar,
we are doing some research application as part of it we are
trying to
optimise the kaffe JVM .So we removed almost all the lib,doc...
now it came to 1.5Mb
to further optimise it i am thinking of removing un used user
define class loader
Kiyo Inaba wrote:
Hi Dalibor,
Konnichiwa Kiyo,
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Kiyo Inaba wrote:
As I said, I am now unifing machine specific portion of jit file.
Attached is the result for step 1.
While doing this merge, I found several errors for both jit and jit3.
It can be a good co-product of this effort
Kiyo Inaba wrote:
Hi,
I've been back from Europe, Japan is still too hot.
I start to merge config/m68k/{jit,jit3}-m68k.def for easier maintenance,
and I noticed jit3-m68k.def uses macro 'abort' rather than 'ABORT'.
It also happens for several other jit def files. According to the
ChangeLog.1 (by Go
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Riccardo wrote:
Hey,
I compiled on solaris 2.6, sparc, jit, default GC and a trimmed-down
class profile w/o szing so I could build with KJC
we have 8 failures
BeanBug.fail SoTimeout.fail
CLTestConc.failTestUnlock.fail
NetworkInterfaceTest.fail Threa
Hi,
When using kaffe's jar tool in update mode, I noticed the jar file ends up
with duplicate entries. Then if you update again, thre entries for the same
file, ...
This makes the jar grow indefinitely, and be invalid.
I put up a testcase at:
http://cristal.inria.fr/~bonniot/jarbug.tgz
Run run m
Hi Dalibor,
Dalibor Topic wrote:
>Kiyo Inaba wrote:
>> As I said, I am now unifing machine specific portion of jit file.
>> Attached is the result for step 1.
>>
>> While doing this merge, I found several errors for both jit and jit3.
>> It can be a good co-product of this effort :-)
>
>Thank you
PatchSet 5136
Date: 2004/09/02 08:10:07
Author: dalibor
Branch: HEAD
Tag: (none)
Log:
Unification of jit-m68k.def and jit3-m68k.def: step one
2004-09-01 Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* config/m68k/jit-m68k.def,
config/m68k/jit3-m68k.def: Unification of jit-m68k.def and
Hi,
I can't get any non-default locale to work with the following program:
import java.util.Date;
import java.text.DateFormat;
public class Bug
{
static DateFormat longDate = DateFormat.getDateTimeInstance();
public static void main(String[] args)
{
System.out.println(longDate.format(new
sita wrote:
Hi Dalibor,
The problem with using dprintf and configure options in this
scenario is
there will be a lot of information and parameters printed to the file
which I may not need.
I have put some specific hooks in the JVM(these are the only things
that I want) using fprintf w
Kiyo Inaba wrote:
Hi,
As I said, I am now unifing machine specific portion of jit file.
Attached is the result for step 1.
While doing this merge, I found several errors for both jit and jit3.
It can be a good co-product of this effort :-)
Hi Kiyo,
Thank you very much for undertaking the effort ;)
Riccardo wrote:
Hey,
I compiled on solaris 2.6, sparc, jit, default GC and a trimmed-down
class profile w/o szing so I could build with KJC
we have 8 failures
BeanBug.fail SoTimeout.fail
CLTestConc.failTestUnlock.fail
NetworkInterfaceTest.fail ThreadState.fail
Preempt.f
11 matches
Mail list logo