Re: [kaffe] need your help in optimising Kaffe

2004-09-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Kirankumar T wrote: hi Hi Kirankumar, we are doing some research application as part of it we are trying to optimise the kaffe JVM .So we removed almost all the lib,doc... now it came to 1.5Mb to further optimise it i am thinking of removing un used user define class loader

Re: [kaffe] Unification of jit-m68k.def and jit3-m68k.def (step 1)

2004-09-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Kiyo Inaba wrote: Hi Dalibor, Konnichiwa Kiyo, Dalibor Topic wrote: Kiyo Inaba wrote: As I said, I am now unifing machine specific portion of jit file. Attached is the result for step 1. While doing this merge, I found several errors for both jit and jit3. It can be a good co-product of this effort

Re: [kaffe] 'ABORT' or 'abort'?

2004-09-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Kiyo Inaba wrote: Hi, I've been back from Europe, Japan is still too hot. I start to merge config/m68k/{jit,jit3}-m68k.def for easier maintenance, and I noticed jit3-m68k.def uses macro 'abort' rather than 'ABORT'. It also happens for several other jit def files. According to the ChangeLog.1 (by Go

Re: [kaffe] solaris sparc status (failed reg)

2004-09-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Dalibor Topic wrote: Riccardo wrote: Hey, I compiled on solaris 2.6, sparc, jit, default GC and a trimmed-down class profile w/o szing so I could build with KJC we have 8 failures BeanBug.fail SoTimeout.fail CLTestConc.failTestUnlock.fail NetworkInterfaceTest.fail Threa

[kaffe] [BUG] jar creating duplicate entries

2004-09-02 Thread Daniel Bonniot
Hi, When using kaffe's jar tool in update mode, I noticed the jar file ends up with duplicate entries. Then if you update again, thre entries for the same file, ... This makes the jar grow indefinitely, and be invalid. I put up a testcase at: http://cristal.inria.fr/~bonniot/jarbug.tgz Run run m

Re: [kaffe] Unification of jit-m68k.def and jit3-m68k.def (step 1)

2004-09-02 Thread Kiyo Inaba
Hi Dalibor, Dalibor Topic wrote: >Kiyo Inaba wrote: >> As I said, I am now unifing machine specific portion of jit file. >> Attached is the result for step 1. >> >> While doing this merge, I found several errors for both jit and jit3. >> It can be a good co-product of this effort :-) > >Thank you

[kaffe] CVS kaffe (dalibor): Unification of jit-m68k.def and jit3-m68k.def: step one

2004-09-02 Thread Kaffe CVS
PatchSet 5136 Date: 2004/09/02 08:10:07 Author: dalibor Branch: HEAD Tag: (none) Log: Unification of jit-m68k.def and jit3-m68k.def: step one 2004-09-01 Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * config/m68k/jit-m68k.def, config/m68k/jit3-m68k.def: Unification of jit-m68k.def and

[kaffe] Non-default locales not working (java.text.DateFormat)

2004-09-02 Thread Daniel Bonniot
Hi, I can't get any non-default locale to work with the following program: import java.util.Date; import java.text.DateFormat; public class Bug { static DateFormat longDate = DateFormat.getDateTimeInstance(); public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println(longDate.format(new

Re: [kaffe]printing to a file in kaffe

2004-09-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
sita wrote: Hi Dalibor, The problem with using dprintf and configure options in this scenario is there will be a lot of information and parameters printed to the file which I may not need. I have put some specific hooks in the JVM(these are the only things that I want) using fprintf w

Re: [kaffe] Unification of jit-m68k.def and jit3-m68k.def (step 1)

2004-09-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Kiyo Inaba wrote: Hi, As I said, I am now unifing machine specific portion of jit file. Attached is the result for step 1. While doing this merge, I found several errors for both jit and jit3. It can be a good co-product of this effort :-) Hi Kiyo, Thank you very much for undertaking the effort ;)

Re: [kaffe] solaris sparc status (failed reg)

2004-09-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Riccardo wrote: Hey, I compiled on solaris 2.6, sparc, jit, default GC and a trimmed-down class profile w/o szing so I could build with KJC we have 8 failures BeanBug.fail SoTimeout.fail CLTestConc.failTestUnlock.fail NetworkInterfaceTest.fail ThreadState.fail Preempt.f