Hello,
I tried using kaffe to run a simple application that uses the spring
framework[1]'s IoC[2] container (version 1.2.2).
My main method looks like this:
public static void main( String[] args ) {
XmlBeanFactory factory = new XmlBeanFactory(new
ClassPathResource("beans.xml"));
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> does kaffe provide a sun compatible libjvm ?
On 7/12/05, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anecdotal evidence from Debian and other distributions suggests that
> Kaffe is compatible enough with Sun's VM to run a growing number of
> current applications, but it also
PatchSet 6725
Date: 2005/07/12 23:50:48
Author: robilad
Branch: HEAD
Tag: (none)
Log:
Added jni weak ref tests
2005-07-13 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* test/jni/Makefile.am: (check_PROGRAMS) Added jniWeakTest.
(check_LTLIBRARIES, libjniweaklib_la_SOURCES, libjniweaklib_l
Hi all,
here is the debian bug reports summary:
Bugs not fixed (tested by me):
#255418:
Error when directory containing the class has special characters
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=255418
Seems not to be kaffe specific (jamvm/sablevm fail too)
#305258: java/lang/Runtime.av
Dalibor,
> I am using crostools for my general cross-building pleasures, though
> I'll need to regenerate all the (two dozen, or so) toolchains again with
> 0.37 which might take me a few days.
I have tried this, but it does not seem to work for me. What are the
platforms/configurations that you
Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Hi Dalibor,
>
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
>>Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>I'd recommend against packaging a CVS snapshot (unless it should go for
>>exprimental), as jvw and vorlon didn't really want to have CVS snaps in
>>the archives. If you want to package a CVs snap,
Hi Dalibor,
Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Wolfgang Baer wrote:
[...]
>
> I'd recommend against packaging a CVS snapshot (unless it should go for
> exprimental), as jvw and vorlon didn't really want to have CVS snaps in
> the archives. If you want to package a CVs snap, I could make dist a
> 1.1.6-pre1 f
Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The shared libkaffevm-1.1.5.so contains text relocation on x86. This is
> caused by trampolines.S assembler code not being PIC compliant.
Hallo Peter,
sorry for the late reply.
I've looked into it, being prompted by linking failures with jit on
darwin, whi
PatchSet 6724
Date: 2005/07/12 13:35:38
Author: robilad
Branch: HEAD
Tag: (none)
Log:
Added missing hunk of changes to GtkTextAreaPeer
2005-07-12 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resynced with GNU classpath.
Added missing hunk reported by Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Wolfgang,
> I am in the process of packaging a new kaffe package for unstable
> (CVS 09 July 04).
I'd recommend against packaging a CVS snapshot (unless it should go for
exprimental), as jvw and vorlon didn't really want to have CVS snaps in
the archives. If you wan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all.
> I'm porting kaffe on the arm cpu(PXA250).
> I have some questions.
> ==
> 1. CC=arm-linux-gcc NM=arm-linux-nm AR=arm-linux-ar ./configure
> --host=arm-linux
> --build=i686-linux
> *** error message ***
> configure: error: Could not find GNU MP l
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> does kaffe provide a sun compatible libjvm ?
Hi Enrico,
since the Kaffe project does not have access to the official
compatibility test suites from the JCP, it is hard to give a definite
answer: we don't know yet.
Anecdotal evidence from Debian and other
Frank Tao wrote:
> hello,
>
> Have you handled the problem of KVM porting to ucLinux?
> I meet the same problem and want to ask you some questions, is that ok?
> thank you!
> waitting for your response. :)
Hi Frank,
Kaffe has been ported to uclinux before, it is not the same thing as the
KVM tho
PatchSet 6723
Date: 2005/07/12 12:50:26
Author: robilad
Branch: HEAD
Tag: (none)
Log:
Resynced with GNU classpath: missing XML checkin
2005-07-12 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resynced with GNU classpath.
2005-06-14 Chris Burdess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gnu/xml/a
Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Simon Kitching wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I raised an xml-related bug [1] against classpath which was recently
>>marked "fixed" by Chris Burgess (before 0.16 classpath). I would like to
>>get my hands on a Kaffe version with the fix in it so I can test apache
>>jakarta-commons proj
Simon Kitching wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I raised an xml-related bug [1] against classpath which was recently
> marked "fixed" by Chris Burgess (before 0.16 classpath). I would like to
> get my hands on a Kaffe version with the fix in it so I can test apache
> jakarta-commons projects against kaffe but it
Hi all,
there are two feature enhancement requests in the debian kaffe
bug tracker which have not yet been forwarded:
javah missing -force option
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=304927
Add -V option to jar implementation
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=2965
Hi,
I raised an xml-related bug [1] against classpath which was recently
marked "fixed" by Chris Burgess (before 0.16 classpath). I would like to
get my hands on a Kaffe version with the fix in it so I can test apache
jakarta-commons projects against kaffe but it *appears* that kaffe
doesn't have
18 matches
Mail list logo
