[kaffe] Kaffe1.1.7 for MIPS target - Illegal instruction?

2007-06-11 Thread hjzhang
Hello, everyone: I compile and build Kaffe1.1.7 for MIPS 4Kc V0.9 in pc, after i porting kaffe to mips and set PATH and CLASSPATH, then I try to run a helloworld.class like: java helloworld, an it returns : Illegal instruction, what does that mean? Thanks! Joey

Re: kaffe 1.1.8 (Was: Re: [kaffe] Future directions for Kaffe)

2007-06-11 Thread Dalibor Topic
Kiyo Inaba wrote: So, from releasing point of view (based on Dalibor's and Riccardo's wish list), we still have to D] Either fix the serialization bugs leading to the two failing regression tests, or mark them as XFAILs, and file bugs for it in GNU Classpath's tracker, adding the failing tests

Re: [kaffe] Kaffe1.1.7 for MIPS target - Illegal instruction?

2007-06-11 Thread Dalibor Topic
hjzhang wrote: Hello, everyone: I compile and build Kaffe1.1.7 for MIPS 4Kc V0.9 in pc, after i porting kaffe to mips and set PATH and CLASSPATH, then I try to run a helloworld.class like: java helloworld, an it returns : Illegal instruction, what does that mean? Thanks! That means that the

Re: [kaffe] jit3 support for PowerPC

2007-06-11 Thread Dalibor Topic
Francisco Hoyos wrote: Hello. Searching through the mail archives I found out that jit3 support for ppc is not finished yet (this is from about a year ago). Hi Francisco, that's still the current status. If you want to have a go at completing it, read FAQ/FAQ.jit3, FAQ/FAQ.debugging and have

Re: kaffe 1.1.8 (Was: Re: [kaffe] Future directions for Kaffe)

2007-06-11 Thread Dalibor Topic
Dalibor Topic wrote: D] Remove the merged in GNU Classpath and just use an existing installation I did the lower-half separation (separate build) but not yet change the upper-half to point the location of classpath. Ideas like 'with-classpath-prefix', 'with-classpath-libdir' or

Re: kaffe 1.1.8 (Was: Re: [kaffe] Future directions for Kaffe)

2007-06-11 Thread Kiyo Inaba
Dalibor and others, Dalibor wrote: D) Merge in tbfg's m68k patch. Kiyo, could you take a look at it? http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2007-June/104949.html Yes, I've spent some time to investigate this proposal. In general, the patch posted tries to comment out some instructions which are